[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Note this HPS Newsletter article
Jim,
I thank you sending this article. It gives a nice overview of the biology
behind what we know and don't know, and puts a prespective on the issues.
As Dr. Walinder mentions, all malignancies do not develop and progress the
same. That is why we are stuck with the LNT in radiation protection. It is
the most conservative relationship between dose and response. It is like a
hospital gown, one size fits all. (I actually believe one size fits none.)
I think as soon as the public accepts the fact that life comes with risk and
exposures to radiation may (or may not, depending on the dose) is one of
those risks, we will be able to see some realistic acceptance of nuclear
power, waste, etc.
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
3050 Traymore Lane
Bowie, MD 20715-2024
E-mail: jenday1@email.msn.com (H)
-----Original Message-----
From: Muckerheide [mailto:muckerheide@MEDIAONE.NET]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:09 PM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Note this HPS Newsletter article
. . .
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/