[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Removable Contamination Surveys



Title: Removable Contamination Surveys
The *logic* of doubling the area covered risks rubbing through the swipe if carried to the logical extreme.  I don't know the effect on computations of actually doubling the area.  A 'saturating the swipe' argument seems easy.
 
Trying to match the detection limits and contamination limits depends on the statistics in between; is a swipe 100% efficient?
 
The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:50 PM
Subject: Removable Contamination Surveys

Can anyone give me some insight (and possible source documents) into the reasons for the 100cm^2 standard (or suggestion?) used for removable contamination surveys?  Why is it 100cm^2 and not 1,000cm^2, or something smaller or larger?  Is there anything wrong with increasing the swiped area to increasing the likelihood of detection? 

Specifically, assume a removable contamination limit is set at 200 dpm/100cm^2 for a laboratory and a researcher wishes to use a survey meter to count the swipes.  According to the manufacturer's formula and values (for efficiency of the radionuclide, etc), the meter has an MDA of 400 dpm.  Is there anything wrong with performing the survey over 200 cm^2 so that the detection limit would meet the removable contamination limit?

Thanks,

Pete Jenkins






















Confidentiality Note: The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.