[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE:"Too Cheap to meter"
We should note that the statement was made nearly fifty years ago, by a
lawyer (Strauss) to science writers, musing about the future, when disease
and war would be a thing of the past, etc. It was an impromptu remark, not
in his written presentation. But it has been used to damn the whole
industry, as if it were a legal commitment made under oath and sealed with a
signed contract.
That said, let me again say that I think the public's fear of radiation is
nearly all our fault. Step back outside the nuclear beltway and assume you
are a reporter, a non-nuclear scientist, or a policy-maker. You don't go to
ANS or NEI rallies or read nuclear news or radsafe. So you find out about
nuclear matters from the media. Where do reporters get their info? From
nuclear people who write WASH-740 and send tables of immediate and long-term
deaths to every paper in the country. 102,000 immediate deaths from one
plant, if I recall. And we invented the China Syndrome, Price-Anderson
insurance, multi-state evacuation plans, potassium iodide distribution, 1
million-year integrity requirements, and multi-billion dollar programs to
handle waste.
Top this with a Secretary of Energy who says we're killing people with
low-level radiation, and LNT reports saying there is no safe level of
radiation and radon in the home kills tens of thousands each year. We still
can't get anyone to deny public statements that a spent fuel cask can spread
death and destruction and that a plane can fly through a containment wall.
How could any reasonable person help but conclude that nuclear activities
pose an unprecedented hazard to the race? All the antis have to do is to
point to statements by nuclear "proponents."
We kill nuclear power every day, then blame the maggots for damaging the
corpse.
Ted