[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cohen's Refutation of LNT
Don,
There you go, again.
Science is not Who, but What.
Multiple causation requires recognition of uncertainty. That seems foreign to
authorities pronouncing "flat earth" or "LNT".
Application of the precautionary principle requires that we explore supplying
deprived peoples with what now appears to be an essential trace energy : about 1
rem/year of ionizing radiation.
Shades of fluoridation, or, better, iodized salt choice!
Howard Long
Rad health wrote:
> Howard,
>
> Seiler and Alvarez never had any epidemiology training, it is pretty evident
> from their paper. How can you talk about truth and not even know they are
> not epidemiologist? I bet Dr. Cohen would be hard pressed to explain what
> Seiler's and Alvarez's paper has to do with his ecologic studies. By the
> way, absolutely nothing. Go ahead ask Dr. Cohen if he agrees with their
> "thought experiment". It is pure nonsense. They say their paper would not
> hold if Dr. Cohen's radon data was correlated with some other factor. Hey,
> guess what. There is a huge inverse relationship between radon and smoking,
> sort of an inverse correlation going on there. Now that's truth. Maybe
> they should have understood his paper a bit better before they wrote theirs.
>
> I would love to read Seiler's recent letter to the editor of that same
> journal. I am not sure that journal is even peer reviewed. I bet it makes
> amusing reading. It is interesting they did not post their letter to the
> radsafe list. Wonder why?
>
> Howard, speaking of real epidemiologists. Try asking Dr. Colditz, an
> epidemiologist at Harvard School of Public Health what he thinks of Dr.
> Cohen's interpretation of his ecologic findings. It would make an
> interesting letter in itself.
>
> Wonder why Dr. Colditz does not respond to the articles writen by other
> epidemiologists such as Drs. Doll, Field, Archer, Goldsmith, Darby, and
> Lubin criticizing Dr. Cohen's interpretation of his findings?
>
> Don Smith
>
> >From: hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net
> >Reply-To: hflong@pacbell.net
> >To: Rad health <healthrad@hotmail.com>
> >CC: hflong@pacbell.net, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> >Subject: Re:
> >Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:45:52 -0800
> >
> >Dear Harvey Griswold and other LNT Proponents
> >"In a recent paper, we have demonstrated that the confounding factors in
> >the
> >radon data of Cohen (1995) do not invalidate these data for risk
> >assessments,
> >contrary to the claims of some epidemiologists (Seiler and Alvarez 2000)."
> >
> >Truth, not authority, decides science.
> >
> >Howard Long
> >
> >Rad health wrote:
> >
> > > Dr. Long,
> > >
> > > It is pretty obvious you are jealous of Dr. Field's work. He has
> >received
> > > numerous accolades from the EPA, NCI, NIEHS, past Health Physics Society
> > > president to name just a few. I have been to meetings where he has had
> > > numerous standing ovations for the rigor of his design. When I first
> >read
> > > your emails, I thought you actually knew something about epidemiology.
> >I
> > > see that was an error.
> > >
> > > For someone who has never published a peer reviewed epidemiology article
> >you
> > > are pretty bold in word.
> > >
> > > Cohen's fallacy lives!
> > >
> > > Harvey Griswald
> > > Harvard School of Public Health
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/