[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE:



I realize you're using concepts. I'm using real life. And ". . . in

principle should be established on a case . . . basis" is not the same as

setting detrimentally low limits, which is what has been done by the

international community.



Jack Earley

Radiological Engineer





-----Original Message-----

From: J. J. Rozental [mailto:joseroze@netvision.net.il]

Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:38 PM

To: Jack_Earley@rl.gov; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re:





I am using ICRP and IAEA concepts. Each country, accepting the concepts of

these documents should select the way to assure compliance with. In terms of

public, dose constraints for sources within practices are expressed as an

additional annual dose lower than 1 mSv and in principle should be

established on case-by-case,  e.g. for a single source of ~0.3mSv, which

could be ~0.1 mSv for the prolonged exposure.



Jose Julio Rozental

joseroze@netvision.net.il

Israel





----- Original Message -----

From: <Jack_Earley@RL.gov>

To: <joseroze@NETVISION.NET.IL>; <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 5:13 PM

Subject: RE:





<<Generally, taken the above into consideration, the constraint varies from

10 to 30% of the dose limit.>>



<<Finally, if the Dose Constraint is exceeded it is necessary taken action

to prevent recurrence, however the dose limit will not be exceeded. In this

case there is not enforcement by the Regulatory Authority. However exceeding

the limit, of coarse it will be also necessary actions however in this case

generally the Regulatory Authority applies enforcement.>>





You seem to be referring to two different approaches, i.e., dose estimates

for a given job, and administrative limits/guidelines that are set to

prevent exceeding dose limits. Dose estimates are based on the time in a

given work area w/ a defined exposure rate. Being high or low by 25 percent

or more, for example, can trigger an investigation to determine why the

estimate was wrong.



Administrative limits, which can be exceeded w/ concurrence from management,

are generally set at 75 to 80 percent of the dose limit. This varies

depending on the levels of management required to be involved.



Jack Earley

Radiological Engineer





-----Original Message-----

From: J. J. Rozental [mailto:joseroze@NETVISION.NET.IL]

Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:43 AM

To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re:





Dear colleagues,



Seem to me that some colleagues are making confusion between dose limit and

dose constraint.

If there is not a good understand on dose constraint surely it is necessary

refreshment, because dose constraint is fundamental objective of the

optimization.

Is dose constraint a dose limit – No, constraint should not be confused with

the limit. Dose limit is the dose that an individual could receive from the

whole of the practices to which he/she can be exposed at the present. The

concept of “dose constraint” was explicitly introduced in ICRP 60 within the

context of optimization of protection. This concept, however, is not new and

its introduction corresponds, rather, to an attempt to consolidate and

rationalize a variety of concepts that already existed in previous ICRP

guidance.

A dose constraint is the value of individual dose that is expected not to be

exceeded in the predicted individual dose distribution resulting from the

optimization process. Dose constraints needs to be applied in the planning

of protection in all situations where optimization is involved, as design or

modification of plants, preparation of an operation, or to release of

airborne radioactive effluents to the environment, etc.  The dose constraint

may be related to:

A source such a simple small one, a single machine or a big installation;

A set of sources in an installation;

A particular task in connection with a source or set of sources, or a

complete job, such as a specified maintenance task, or a group of operations

in a specific type of industry

Examples, Industrial radiography in urban zone, Use of radioactive tracer in

hydrology, incineration of waste, etc

In each case, those who establish constraints must clearly describe the

relevant source, and the magnitude of the constraint selected should be

appropriate to the purpose in hand

Generally, taken the above into consideration, the constraint varies from 10

to 30% of the dose limit

In the case of public exposure, object of the discussion, what is more

important for member of the public: Dose Constraint or Dose Limit?

According with ICRP, for public exposure the constraints are more important

than the limits, because public can be submitted to sources of other

practices, and the final dose received for the member of the public should

be never higher than de limit.

Example a person living near a nuclear Installation (member of the group

critical) and working in Hospital where practices of nuclear medicine are

authorized.

Finally, if the Dose Constraint is exceeded it is necessary taken action to

prevent recurrence, however the dose limit will not be exceeded. In this

case there is not enforcement by the Regulatory Authority. However exceeding

the limit, of coarse it will be also necessary actions however in this case

generally the Regulatory Authority applies enforcement.



Jose Julio Rozental

joseroze@netvision.net.il

Israel

































************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/