[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ARTICLE: Fallout likely caused 15,000 deaths



Friends,



Re a few 'private' comments/inquiries, anyone may send this anywhere you think it will do any good. You can 'pirate' it, to adopt and send without attribution. You can especially improve it, in which case you owe me a copy. :-)



Regards, Jim

 

-----Original Message-----

From:	Jim Muckerheide





Editors,

 

Your fallout radiation mortality article shows that you are being used

to promulgate a fraud. 

 

If the subject small fallout doses could cause adverse health effects,

much less deaths, millions of people exposed to higher background

radiation doses (e.g., more than 500 mrem per year) would have higher

mortality than in the millions of people exposed to low background

radiation (e.g., less than 100 mrem per year.) Actual data show, if

anything, the opposite results. Also, hundreds of millions of people

that have had diagnostic, and some moderate levels of therapeutic,

radiation would have excess mortality. This is not true, even though it

is true that people exposed to high doses have adverse effects and

excess deaths. 

 

The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic

Radiation (UNSCEAR) has had to report that there are no deaths in the

public even from the Chernobyl accident, though the surrounding

population was not evacuated. Now, 16 years later, there is only a very

small increase in the number of thyroid cancers primarily in persons who

were children less than about 7 years old at the time of the accident,

with no related mortality reported. This was confirmed in a June 2001

meeting that included the World Health Organization (WHO) and the

affected countries. Recently, the UNSCEAR, WHO conclusions were

confirmed in a report including the UN Childrens Fund and UN Development

Program.

 

Radiation is natural, and more ubiquitous to life than sunlight or

water. When natural background radiation is suppressed, organisms show

adverse effects. Supplemental radiation is beneficial, like a grow light

to plants. For thousands of years people have found high radiation areas

to contribute to good health and to cure many physiological conditions,

and infectious and inflammatory diseases. This stimulating effect is

also applied to prevent and cure some cancers.

 

The cellular machinery of life on earth developed when the radiation was

much higher than as it is now. Uranium 238 has a half-life about the age

of the earth, 4.5 billion years. There was twice as much, along with all

of its decay products, including radium, radon, etc. when life evolved.

Uranium 235 has a 700 million year half life, so there was 6-8 times as

much. Potassium 40, a radioactive component of this critical element in

cellular functioning, has a 1.3 billion year half-life, providing a

radiation dose about 3 times the 20-40 mrem per year we receive from

potassium in our bodies. When the small radioactive component of natural

potassium was removed from natural potassium, cells and organisms, and

small animals, had adverse effects, including death. When the removed

potassium was replaced, or natural potassium substituted, or exposures

supplemented by other radiation sources, the cells or organisms

recovered. As a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff member

testified to an NRC Advisory Board in 1996, from his personal knowledge

of such AEC-funded research in 1958, such results were not published

because it refutes the false government premise that radiation is

harmful at low doses. 

 

The NRC, with specific direction by then current Commissioners, refused

to examine this allegation of science misconduct and fraud, as they

supported yet another report by the same people that have misrepresented

the science at the National Council of Radiation Protection and

Measurements (NCRP) to again explicitly suppress the identified evidence

that contradicts their objectives. This defrauds the public of $100s

Billions in the name of "radiation protection" for trivial doses

compared to just the variation in background radiation that can have NO

public health benefit.

 

Regards, Jim Muckerheide

President, Radiation, Science, and Health

Co-Director, Center for Nuclear Technology and Society at WPI

http://cnts.wpi.edu/rsh

 

See the reports at the top right of the web page:

http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/Docs/index.html 

 

See also our comments on the actions of the Federal agencies under

"Correspondence and Comments" in the left column

 







************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/