[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ALARA and "what is safe enough"
Bravo Sandy, people that equate ALARA to Safety evidently have no idea that
safety is a limit way out there, way far a way from ALARA. ALARA IS NOT
RELATED TO SAFETY. If you cannot get below the safety limit....it is
unsafe (period). It is not unsafe if you are below the safety limit,
therefore the word "safe" cannot be use as a measure or qualifier for ALARA.
Dean Chaney, CHP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>
To: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: ALARA and "what is safe enough"
> > The question should be "What is safe enough (ie ALARA)?" not "What is
> > safe?".
>
> One can not equate ALARA and "what is safe enough". They are not
synonymous. In
> facility A the ALARA goal need not be the same as facility B or C or D.
ALARA was
> never deemed to be considered equivalent to what is considered to be a
safe level.
> Please also note that the NRC (rightly so) removed the prescriptive levels
of what
> was to be considered ALARA in 10CFR20, as was once proposed.
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/