[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Criticality accident

To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Subject: Re: Criticality accident
From: Paul lavely <lavelyp@UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:06:37 -0800
Cc: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
In-Reply-To: <14e.aa60f96.29c754a5@aol.com>
References: <14e.aa60f96.29c754a5@aol.com>
Reply-To: Paul lavely <lavelyp@UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Title: Re: Criticality accident

I don't think 21 accidents in 60 years qualifies as "many."

Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.

ruthweiner@aol.com

What number of accidental criticalities and deaths would be needed to qualify as "many"?

Paul Lavely <lavelyp@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Criticality accident
  - From: Gary Isenhower <garyi@BCM.TMC.EDU>

References:
- Re: Criticality accident
  - From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM

Prev by Date: RE: Criticality accident
Next by Date: Re: Criticality accident
Prev by thread: Re: Criticality accident
Next by thread: Re: Criticality accident
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread