[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Low Level Radiation Health Effects: Compiling the Data
>From: "Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH" <rbertell@adelphia.net>
>To: <abolition-caucus@yahoogroups.com>, <Know_Nukes@yahoogroups.com>, "Jim
Hoerner" <jim_hoerner@hotmail.com>
>
>Dear Folks,
>
>Because many of you are genuinely interested in the dialogue over low level
>radiation, and because not all people restrict their information to ICRP
>publications, I will give some suggested helpful readings:
>
>1. "Principles of Radiation Protection", by Karl Z. Morgan (Morgan is
>known as
>the Father of Heath Physics), John Wiley & Sons. New York,1967. This was
>for a long time the text book for Health Physics. This deals with such
>questions as the ratio of alpha to gamma radiation dose in terms of the
>relative biological effectiveness (RBE) as the dose moves toward zero (low
>dose range). It states that RBE for cytological effects (damage to cells)
>tends to a MAXIMUM as the dose becomes smaller. This means that it is
>higher than expected at low doses. Put a little more clearly, there is more
>survivable damage to living cells at low doses of alpha particle radiation
>within the human body than at higher doses, where more cells are killed or
>made sterile. It is only at high levels of cell killing that the ratio
>"often tends to a constant". Uranium, radium and thorium are alpha particle
>emitters, and this phenomena may be important in the effect of DU
>ammunition.
>
>In Chapter !!, this text book discusses not only carcinogenesis and
>leukaemogenesis, but also the large category "other forms of morbidity and
>life-shortening", based on American Radiologists and Hiroshima and Nagasaki
>survivors, The text notes the increase with radiation exposure of "certain
>non-malignant diseases as well. The most important group of disorders in
>this latter category comprises the degenerative diseases of the
>cardiovascular and renal systems. .... The absolute mortality rate for the
>cardiovascular-renal diseases is much higher than for all cancers, the
>actual surplus of deaths among the United States radiologists is higher in
>the cardiovascular-renal than in the cancer group."
>
>The text continues: "Many authors have recently suggested that various
>idiopathic non-malignant morbid and mortal diseases in man [Editorial
>Comment: and certainly in women] may be fundamentally autoimmune in
>character. Detailed analysis suggests that these diseases have a
>spontaneous
>disturbed-tolerance autoimmune aetiology and that they are initiated by the
>formation of 'forbidden-clones'".
>
>There is more interesting detail and ample references in this text book.
>
>2. "Radiosensitivity Mechanisms at Low Doses: Inflammatory Responses to
>microGray Radiation Levels in Human Blood", by Michael G. Vicker, Dept. of
>Biology, University of Bremen. Internal. Perspectives in Public Health, Vol
>9: 4-20, 1993.
>
>This give much more detail on the "forbidden clones" and the mechanisms by
>which low doses of radiation induce them.
>
>3. "X-ray Exposure and Premature Aging", Rosalie Bertell, Roswell Park
>Memorial Cancer Institute. Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 9,379 - 391,
>1977
>
>Provides the first estimate of aging per rad exposure from external low dose
>medical X-ray. Description of the methodology is in "Response of Rosalie
>Bertell to the Critique of Michael Ginevan", Health Physics Journal Vol. 41,
>422-424, 1981. Ginevan had written article in which he wrongly presented
>what he called the "Bertell Methodology", and then proceeded to critique his
>caricature.
>
>4. "Internal Bone Seeking Radionuclides and Monocyte Counts" , Rosalie
>Bertell, President, Internal Institute of Concern for Public Health,
>Toronto. Vol. 9, 21-26, 1993. This strengthens the thesis about low dose
>alpha radiation affecting the cellular immune system.
>
>5. "Radiation and Heredity" by H. Muller, Am. Journal of Public Health Vol.
>54, 42 - 50, 1964. Muller received the Nobel Prize in 1944 for demonstrating
>the genetic effects of radiation, and its much higher mutagenicity rate than
>chemical agents.
>
>6. For several articles on cardiovascular-renal problems related to low
>dose radiation see the work of Erwin DJ Bross, Director of Biostatistics,
>Roswell Park Memorial Cancer Institute. He published a number of papers on
>this around 1975 - 1980. (I am retired and do not have access to my
>library, so you will have to look up the exact references for these.)
>
>7. The history of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
>can be found in "No Immediate Danger: Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth",
>The Women's Press, London, 1986 (Translated into French, German, Swedish,
>Finnish)
>
>You can also find it in early volumes of ICRP. It was the Radiologist's
>organization which was started in 1928, not the ICRP. As I note is my
>response to Jim Hoerner, the physicists from the Manhattan Project asked to
>join this radiologist's organization in about 1950, and set their first
>radiation exposure limits as part of this organization. They also changed
>the name at that time. The physicists have maintained about 50% membership
>in the Main Committee (which makes the decisions) since then, while the
>participation of Radiologists has been reduced to about 15%. The group
>added Medical Regulators from the nuclear nations, who generally make up 25%
>of the decision making Main Committee. Decisions have been dominated by the
>physicists.
>
>This is enough to give you a start into a different literature, since all of
>these sources contain extensive bibliographies of their own. I believe that
>students should be taught from all of these sources and not indoctrinated by
>one source. Reality is seldom so one sided as the portrayal by ICRP.
>
>Dr. Rosalie Bertell
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover
http://greetings.yahoo.com/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/