Re: Indian Point story

[maury <maury@WEBTEXAS.COM>]

True, sad but probably in the ballpark. It will come as no surprise when some

animal defense league files a wrongful death suit charging that radiation from

this or that reactor is responsible for the premature death of their highly

prized show dogs .... stay tuned; details at 11 ....



In a more serious vein, I wonder if any farm or ranch has tried this yet using

the allegations of damaging rf or other electromagnetic radiation from power

lines, cell phone towers, and so on. Think of all the story lines here ....

great jumpin' butterballs!!!

Maury   webtexas.com

PS John. You know? you may be right .... :-)

====================

Jerry Cohen wrote:



> I can just picture it. 200 years from now, everyone who was alive at the

> time Chernobyl occured will have died and the antinukes will ask how many of

> these dead might still be alive were it not for all the deadly radioactivity

> released at Chernobyl.

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: maury <maury@WEBTEXAS.COM>

> To: Rob Gunter <rgunter@SEC-TN.COM>

> Cc: Radsafe <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:01 PM

> Subject: Re: Indian Point story

>

> > I checked a CRAC-2 summary which says:  "... Early fatalities are deaths

> due to

> > radiation exposure from causes other than cancer occurring within one year

> of

> > the accident. However, fatalities will continue over hundreds, possibly

> > thousands of years. Fatalities in the populace directly ... "  Jeez,

> that's

> > almost enough to scare a person. If they could have included Chernobyl in

> that

> > study, then I wonder what kind of estimates might have been made for it.

> Yes,

> > Rob, in CRAC-2, they estimated short term fatalities many magnitudes

> greater

> > than was observed from Chernobyl.

> >

> > Well, gotta' go.  It is time to begin preparations for the asteroid which

> is

> > supposed to come close to us in 878 years. Wut's a cubit?

> > Cheers,

> > Maury Siskel          maury@webtexas.com

> > ===============================

> > Rob Gunter wrote:

> >

> > > Greetings All,

> > >

> > > Most of the article is tame relative to the statement "A 1982 study

> > > commissioned by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission found that a

> meltdown

> > > at Indian Point 2 could cause 46,000 fatalities and 141,000 injuries in

> the

> > > short term."

> > >

> > > What is meant by "Short Term".  Are we talking "short term" geologic

> time

> > > with the LNT and collective dose, or does the study anticipate an

> accident

> > > with short term fatalities orders of magnitude above Chernobyl??

> > >

> > > Robert J. Gunter, CHP

> > >

> > > -----Original Message-----

> >

> > ------------------------  snipped  ---------------------

> >

> > ************************************************************************

> > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> > send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> > radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> > You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> >

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/