Re: Dental radiology; xeroradiography

[Gary Isenhower <garyi@BCM.TMC.EDU>]

Thanks for saying that.  I was wondering how many would notice that

break in rational thought.  Why would we reduce unecessary radiation

exposure, unless we assume LNT?



Ted Rockwell wrote:

> 

> > I think

> we all agree that if we can reduce unnecessary radiation exposure

> at no cost, then we should do so.  This has nothing to do with LNT.

> It is just common sense.

> 

> No, that has nothing to do with common sense.  It's just LNT.

> 

> Ted Rockwell

> 

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



-- 

    _______________________________________________



	Gary Isenhower

	713-798-8353

	garyi@bcm.tmc.edu

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/