[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bulgaria Considers Nuclear Plant
Index:
Bulgaria Considers Nuclear Plant
5,000 march against Finnish nuclear power plan
OECD chief calls for new look at nuclear energy
Ukrainians Haunted by Chernobyl Past
================================
Bulgaria Considers Nuclear Plant
SOFIA, Bulgaria (AP) - Two Canadian companies have expressed interest
in building a second nuclear plant in Bulgaria, the country's foreign
minister said Sunday.
Solomon Pasi identified the firms as Canada's state nuclear energy
company, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., and SNC-Lavalin Inc., an
engineering and construction company.
Bulgaria and Canada soon will start negotiations on an agreement
dealing with nuclear energy cooperation, Pasi said in remarks to
reporters after returning from a visit to Canada.
But Bulgaria hasn't decided yet whether it will choose the Canadian
companies to build the plant, Pasi said.
The government recently announced it would resume the construction of
a second nuclear power plant near the Danube port of Belene, 155
miles northeast of Sofia. Bulgaria has already invested $1.2 billion
in the project.
Bulgaria must close two of six units at its only nuclear plant in
Kozlodui, 125 miles north of Sofia, by the end of this year under an
agreement with the European Union. The EU considers the Soviet-
designed reactors unsafe.
Under the same agreement, Bulgaria has to negotiate a deadline by the
end of 2004 for closing two more Kozlodui units.
The four units to be closed are 440-megawatt pressurized water
reactors. Two newer 1,000-megawatt units aren't affected by the
agreement.
--------------
5,000 march against Finnish nuclear power plan
HELSINKI, April 26 (Reuters) - Five thousand people marched through
Helsinki on Friday to mark the anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster
and protest against plans to build a new nuclear power plant in
Finland.
Protestors waving anti-nuclear banners and chanting "nuclear energy,
no thanks" marched to parliament to urge politicians to vote against
a
government proposal which would make Finland the only country in
Western Europe building a new nuclear plant.
"We are here to protest because of the danger that Finland will build
more nuclear power," said Sirpa Paakkonen. "It is dangerous,
shortsighted and completely unnecessary."
The peaceful demonstration, which police said was significantly
larger than the 3,000 people initially expected, was believed to the
country's largest since the early 1990s when Finns protested against
unemployment and EU membership.
"Everyone has been nice and calm and the great weather has increased
attendance," said senior police officer Pekka Hook.
It was on April 26, 1986 that a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear
complex in Ukraine exploded and caught fire, spreading a radioactive
cloud across Europe in the world's worst nuclear disaster.
The protestors said they hoped the demonstration would help convince
members of parliament to vote in late May against the government
proposal to construct a fifth reactor.
According to a poll conducted earlier this month 94 MPs of the 200-
member house support the plan while 88 are against and the rest
undecided.
The five-party coalition government, which includes the Green party,
says the best way to satisfy increasing energy demand while ensuring
Finland meets its greenhouse gas emissions obligations under the
Kyoto protocol is to build the country's first new nuclear reactor
for more than two decades.
Opponents say the health and environmental risks are too great, and
other energy sources should be favoured. In 1993 a similar proposal
was rejected in parliament.
The European Union's Environment Commissioner Margot Wallstrom said
recently that Finland could meet the emission targets without
building more nuclear power by relying more on natural gas and
renewable energy.
Finland has four nuclear reactors at two installations, supplying
about 30 percent of total electricity needs.
----------------
OECD chief calls for new look at nuclear energy
PAMPLONA, Spain, April 28 (Reuters) - Industrial countries seeking to
reduce dependence on imported oil and cut greenhouse gases should
look again at nuclear energy, the head of the OECD said on Sunday.
A high-level European Union seminar on the future of energy heard
there were no easy solutions for a Europe seeking ways to meet
growing energy demand while cutting pollution.
European concerns over oil price volatility rose again last week when
Middle East tensions sent oil prices up to $27 a barrel, raising
fears an energy price spike could nip worldwide economic recovery in
the bud.
The 15-nation EU imports 50 percent of its energy and that could grow
to 70 percent in 20 or 30 years. It is attempting to increase output
of renewable energy, such as wind or solar power, but these make up
only a tiny percentage of energy use.
At the same time, the EU is committed, under the Kyoto treaty against
global warming, to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases produced by
burning fossil fuels.
A possible alternative, nuclear power, is regarded with suspicion by
many Europeans because of the problem of dealing with radioactive
waste and disasters such as the 1986 Chernobyl accident in Ukraine.
The Belgian government recently proposed shutting down the nation's
nuclear reactors by 2025, following similar moves by Sweden and
Germany.
But the EU forum in Pamplona, northern Spain, heard surprise support
for nuclear energy.
"I think we have to take another look at nuclear -- a very sober look
at nuclear," said Donald Johnston, secretary-general of the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), saying
this was his personal view.
ADVANTAGES OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
"We cannot see a future ahead and intend to meet the Kyoto targets if
we don't re-examine nuclear in a very serious way."
"Nuclear has many advantages. Nuclear energy is plentiful. It
produces only negligible amounts of greenhouse gases... it is also
very attractive from a security of supply perspective," he added.
Johnston won support from Loyola de Palacio, the EU energy
commissioner. She said the EU must foster renewable energies and make
more efficient use of energy, but added: "We would commit a very
grave error if the EU renounced the use of nuclear energy as,
regrettably, is being proposed in some cases.
"In my opinion, we will have to choose: Either we fulfil Kyoto and
keep nuclear (energy) or we renounce Kyoto and abolish nuclear
energy," she said.
BP <BP.L> Chief Executive John Browne said there was no shortage of
oil or gas. Proven reserves now were 70 percent greater than they
were 30 years ago, he said.
The best way to achieve energy security was to establish a wide range
of secure sources of supply for oil and gas. These sources existed,
he said, saying that as well as the Middle East, the oil Europe
needed in the next decade would come from West Africa and the Caspian
Sea.
Worldwide renewable energy would provide no more than two percent of
total energy needs by 2010 and perhaps three percent by 2020, he
said. "That means that in a growing energy market oil and gas will be
the key sources of supply for the foreseeable future," he said.
David Garman, assistant U.S. secretary for energy efficiency, said
the United States was focusing its efforts on researching new energy
technologies in the laboratory to try to drive down their cost.
Under a project launched this year, the U.S. government is funding
research into fuel cells, which use hydrogen to produce electricity
without creating pollution as petrol engines do.
In 10 or 15 years, Garman said, the United States would know whether
it had the technical capability to put a fuel cell vehicle on the
market. But he said he could not envision the conversion of the whole
car fleet to fuel cells before 2060 or 2080, "perhaps even later".
Anatoly Chubais, chief executive of Russia's largest electricity
company, Unified Energy System <EESR.RTS>, renewed his call for the
linking of Western and Eastern electricity grids, saying there was
currently a "Berlin wall" dividing the two systems.
---------------
Ukrainians Haunted by Chernobyl Past
SLAVUTYCH, Ukraine (AP) - Clutching flickering candles and bunches of
spring flowers, survivors of the world's worst nuclear disaster held
a solemn memorial in the pre-dawn darkness Friday in the town built
to house Chernobyl workers displaced by the accident 16 years ago.
Crowds also gathered at churches, cemeteries and public squares
across the former Soviet Union for ceremonies that began at 1:23 a.m.
- the time on the clocks at the Chernobyl plant when its No. 4
reactor exploded on April 26, 1986, spewing radiation across Europe
and contaminating swaths of then-Soviet Ukraine, Russia and Belarus.
While painful memories of the past were foremost in people's minds
Friday, many Ukrainians who live in the contaminated areas around the
now-shuttered Chernobyl plant are focusing more on their poverty than
on their fragile health.
``People talk about Chernobyl less and less every year. Economic
problems are much more pressing,'' said Igor Pashinsky, chief
psychologist at the Center for Social and Psychological
Rehabilitation in Korosten, a city 60 miles west of Chernobyl whose
65,000 residents were all affected by the accident.
The Ukrainian government says more than 4,000 people involved in the
hastily and poorly organized Soviet cleanup effort after the accident
have died and that more than 70,000 Ukrainians were disabled by the
disaster.
Officials acknowledge that survival often takes priority over health
concerns for the estimated 3.3 million Ukrainians, including 1.5
million children, affected by the accident.
``Parents try however they can to make money to survive,'' said
Valeriy Bekh, head sociologist at the Korosten center. ``Often kids
with two parents live like orphans because their parents are gone all
the time'' trying to eke out a living.
The birth rate in Ukraine has dropped by 50 percent since 1986, while
the death rate has doubled.
Aleksandr Tiplitsky, chief doctor at the Norodychi hospital, 35 miles
west of Chernobyl, said that of the illnesses he treats, ``It's very
hard to say how many cases are directly related to Chernobyl because
inadequate nutrition weakens the immune system.
``I might see a sick child and say, 'It's radiation,' but then I go
to his house and see it's starvation.''
However, doctors and public health officials are unequivocal in
linking the sharp rise in thyroid cancer - especially among children -
to Chernobyl. More than 2,100 Ukrainians who were under 18 at
the time of the accident have undergone thyroid treatment since 1986,
and doctors say that number could spike to 10,000 in the
next two years.
Tens of thousands of people disabled by Chernobyl-related illnesses
receive inadequate health care and 25,000 evacuated families
are still waiting for housing, said Emergency Situations Minister
Vasyl Durdynets.
Of the 160,000 people who were resettled from the area around
Chernobyl, many have returned to evacuated lands because economic
conditions were as bad or worse in their new homes.
Hana Yavchenko, 67, was evacuated from Parishchiv, a village near the
plant, but later returned. She and her husband grow their own
vegetables and fruits because semiweekly government deliveries of
radiation-free food are not enough.
``Is the food clean? Who knows?,'' she said. ``What else do we
have?''
U.N. officials say some 450 to 600 people live in the ``exclusion
zone'' - the area within 18 miles of the plant that was evacuated and
closed off after the accident - and as many as 200,000 live in
``severely contaminated areas'' further away.
***************************************************************
Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
Director, Technical Extension 2306
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service Fax:(714) 668-3149
ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/