Re: free speech

[Gary Isenhower <garyi@bcm.tmc.edu>]

>I assume you have proof that CTs were not being performed.  Or is 

>this another outrageous claim that we accuse the anit-radiation 

>forces?



Hey, let play this debate Yucca Mountain style!  We don't have to prove

its dangerous, YOU have to prove its SAFE!  For radiation scare

articles, please provide proof of the following:



  1) nobody even hesitated to have a CT for themselves or their

children.

  2) nobody suffered undue anxiety as a result of the article.

  3) nobody suffered undue anxiety about their pregnancy.

  3) no abortions were even considered by women who received a head

scan.



If you get around to answering those, don't worry.  There are plenty of

questions where those came from.  Most likely, we can get you a fat

grant to study them too. It should keep you going well past retirement.



By the way, if you don't draw the desired conclusions from your

research, you will be publicly vilified.



    _______________________________________________



	Gary Isenhower

	713-798-8353

	garyi@bcm.tmc.edu