Re: free speech

[epirad@mchsi.com]

Do you think there may be a move to more MRIs that may 

have the possibility of less long term adverse health 

effects?



Bill Field

> 

> >I assume you have proof that CTs were not being performed.  Or is this another 

> outrageous claim that we accuse the anit-radiation forces?

> 

> No one has published a study, no, but I'm not making up the claim. Many medical 

> departments around the country have reported this phenomenon (parents resisting 

> or refusing CTs for their children after this study was published), and we've 

> seen it at Vanderbilt. I'm also not saying that anyone specifically has died 

> from poor diagnosis, my point is that if we cut back on medical care and 

> research, there are actual human beings involved, not theoretical phantom LNT 

> beings, and there will be real health effects. 

> 

> Mike

> 

> Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP

> Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

> Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

> Vanderbilt University

> 1161 21st Avenue South

> Nashville, TN 37232-2675

> Phone (615) 343-0068

> Fax   (615) 322-3764

> e-mail     michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu

> internet   www.doseinfo-radar.com

> 

> 

>   ----- Original Message ----- 

>   From: Jacobus, John (OD/ORS) 

>   To: RadSafe 

>   Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:35 AM

>   Subject: RE: free speech

> 

> 

>   Mike,

>   I assume you have proof that CTs were not being performed.  Or is this another 

> outrageous claim that we accuse the anit-radiation forces?

>   -- John 

> 

>   John Jacobus, MS

>   Certified Health Physicist

>   3050 Traymore Lane

>   Bowie, MD  20715-2024

> 

>   E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)      

> 

> 

>