[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: free speech

To: "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>
Subject: RE: free speech
From: William Prestwich <prestwic@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 09:09:10 -0400 (EDT)
cc: <epirad@mchsi.com>, Michael Stabin <michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu>, RadSafe <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <DB80C41F6AB988429313B8C779B9865B094B21B5@nihexchange6.nih.gov>

I agree, I should have specified procedures using ionizing radiation. The

same principle holds except dose is relaced by SAR.

Bill Prestwich

References:
- RE: free speech
  - From: "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: Yucca Poll Sientific American
Next by Date: Bush Budget weaken's DOE anti-terrorism protections
Prev by thread: Re: free speech
Next by thread: RE: free speech
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread