[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Physicians Speak Out Against Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Transports Through Utah



Index:



Physicians Speak Out Against Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Transports

Gephardt Floor Statement on Yucca Mountain

German Consumers Find Electricity Savings and Environmental Choice

Regulators Want Nuke Dome Replaced

==========================================



Physicians Speak Out Against Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Transports 

Through Utah



SALT LAKE CITY, May 9 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Stepping up its attack on 

the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository, a Nobel Peace Prize-

winning organization announced a series of television ads 

highlighting the dangers of transporting highly radioactive waste 

through Utah.

 

The plan to store 77,000 tons of high-level nuclear at Yucca 

Mountain, 100 miles Northwest of Las Vegas would bring the waste 

through 44 states and the District of Columbia. More than 90 per cent 

of that waste would pass through Utah.

 

"Senators Hatch and Bennett have the power to stop hauling this 

dangerous waste through Utah, protecting the health and welfare of 

all Utahns," said Physicians for Social Responsibility Executive 

Director and CEO Robert K. Musil Ph.D., M.P.H. "Utah's citizens 

deserve better than to host thousands of tons of nuclear waste headed 

to Yucca Mountain on their highways and through their communities."

 

Trucks transporting nuclear waste will become frequent sight on I-70 

and I-15 and in cities like Salt Lake, Provo and Orem. Emergency 

response teams and the public health infrastructure in Utah and all 

across the nuclear waste route are ill-prepared and poorly-equipped 

to handle a radiological accident. This sort of event could result 

from a terrorist attack or a devastating accident, quickly 

overwhelming our public health services.

 

"A conservative Department of Energy estimate claims that only 66 

truck accidents or 10 rail accidents will occur over the span of 

Yucca Mountain's dangerous transportation scheme," said PSR Board 

Member and Salt Lake City Pediatrician Louis Borgenicht, MD. "Even 

one severe accident would cause up to 18,000 latent cancer deaths and 

cost over $17 billion to clean up. This is unacceptable to the people 

of Utah."

 

Physicians for Social Responsibility has joined a broad coalition of 

public health, environmental and civic organizations to oppose the 

Yucca Mountain project and its transportation scheme. To this end, 

they will be broadcasting television spots throughout the month of 

May. The United States Senate will vote in July on whether to uphold 

Nevada Governor Kenny Guinn's veto of the waste dump. Most view this 

vote as the final referendum on the Yucca Mountain project. The ads 

urge Senators Robert Bennett and Orrin Hatch to support Guinn's veto.

 

"The people of Utah must urge their Senators to action," said PSR 

Board Member and Salt Lake City physician Clara Michaels, MD. "By 

pursuing this reckless course of action, President Bush and Energy 

Secretary Spencer Abraham are putting the interests of the nuclear 

industry above the health of millions of Utahns and tens of millions 

of Americans."

----------------



Gephardt Floor Statement on Yucca Mountain



WASHINGTON, May 8 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following is a transcript of 

a statement by House Democratic Leader Richard A. Gephardt:

 

Gephardt Floor Statement on Yucca Mountain

 

(As Delivered)

 

"Mr. Speaker: I rise to urge a vote against the Yucca Mountain 

approval resolution.  I hope this resolution will be turned down.  I 

commend the courageous people fighting against it, led by 

Representative Berkley and Dario Herrera.  I'm sorry that the Bush 

administration went back on its word, approving the untested, 

dangerous measure.

 

"Whether or not to allow storage and transportation of waste is a 

decision with important consequences for people in my district and 

across America.  It is a fact that scientists are still debating 

whether the Yucca Mountain is safe.

 

"The General Accounting Office a few months ago said that storing 

waste at Yucca could infect water supplies and release deadly toxins 

into the surrounding air.  It cited 293 scientific questions for 

which the federal government has no answers.  And even if we begin 

shipping this waste today, we will still have nuclear waste stored 

all over this country decades from now.

 

"But my biggest concern is that it makes no sense to have all this 

material traveling across the country by truck and rail.

 

"You've seen just in the last month a number of tragic rail 

accidents.  Even the Energy Department says that inevitably, there 

will be derailments of trains heading to Yucca Mountain.  I had a 

train derailment in my district a year ago in Webster Groves, 

Missouri, where a whole train turned over.  Luckily, it was only 

coal, but it was coal that was spilled a few feet from homes and 

schools in Webster Groves, Missouri.  And the people in Webster 

Groves in the days since then have said to me, what if it had been 

not coal but nuclear waste?

 

"We have no plan.  We have no resources.  We have no training for 

dealing with such a derailment in St. Louis.  We have only one 

hospital bed in the entire metropolitan area to treat severe 

radiation exposure.

 

"This is not a question about isolating the risk -- Yucca Mountain in 

reality simply spreads it around.

 

"I know there is no perfect solution.  But we can begin now to invest 

in better ways to store waste at the sites we currently use.  

Authorities in Pennsylvania have an approach that puts an emphasis on 

technology and innovation -- an approach that avoids having to cart 

and haul this waste all the way across the United States.  It puts 

the waste in reinforced facilities.  It benefits people in 

Pennsylvania and it benefits all Americans.

 

"I simply think in conclusion that the science and logic is on the 

side of leaving this hazardous material on-site until we can find a 

better solution.  I hope Yucca Mountain will be rejected."

---------------



German Consumers Find Electricity Savings and Environmental Choice at 

their Post Office



WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 9, 2002--What can you get at a local 

post office? For German consumers, 5,000 postal outlets provide a 

convenient place where they can order their electricity, even 

choosing between "green" or conventional nuclear and fossil fuel 

power.

 

Over 50,000 consumers have signed electricity supply contracts at 

their postal outlets in the first six months of a program offered by 

Deutsche Post World Net, operator of Germany's postal system.

 

So far, roughly 15,000 consumers - almost one in three signing 

contracts under the program - are opting for "green" power. Green 

producers market advantages such as how switching to green power can 

reduce CO2 emissions annually by two tons per household, or the 

equivalent of driving a car 6,200 miles.

 

Moreover, the two suppliers of "green" electricity marketing through 

Deutsche Post outlets are price competitive with electricity produced 

from fossil or nuclear energy.

 

The German electricity market was deregulated as part of a 

continental liberalization in early 1998. Last fall, five electricity 

supply companies partnered with Deutsche Post on the marketing 

program at postal outlets. Three are suppliers of conventional 

nuclear or oil- or coal-fired power; two are suppliers of so-called 

"green" power.

 

One of the green brokers, Lichtblick of Hamburg, sells power from 

wind, solar, and hydro sources as well from biomass fuels and 

highly energy efficient, natural gas-fired co-generation that 

produces electricity and steam the latter sold for industrial use. 

Unit(e) of 

Bad Homburg near Frankfurt, sells 100 percent zero greenhouse 

emission electricity from solar sources, wind farms and water 

based generation.

 

Deutsche Post offers consumers two alternatives to their local 

electric utility: one producer of conventional power, and one green 

supplier, both from the list of five partner utilities. (Consumers 

have more choices on the open market, but the one-stop shopping 

aspect of the Deutsche Post program simplifies the process.)

 

Pricing from Deutsche Post's partners tends to be lower than the 

average regional pricing of local utilities, and there is no 

requirement to sign long-term contracts. For Deutsche Post, the 

program is another innovative, value-added service for customers 

that helps maintain the viability of local postal outlets across the 

network.

 

We move the world. Deutsche Post World Net is one of the largest 

logistics companies in the world, with 300,000 employees 

worldwide, including over 16,000 in North America, and revenues of 

more than $30 billion in 2001. The group includes Deutsche 

Post, DHL Worldwide Express, Danzas and Postbank and provides 

international mail, parcel, express and logistics services.

 

Deutsche Post World Net is a member of the DAX 30, making it one of 

the 30 top stocks in Germany.

----------------



Regulators Want Nuke Dome Replaced



OAK HARBOR, Ohio (AP) - Federal regulators say they favor replacement 

rather than repair of the six-inch-thick steel dome that 

was eaten nearly all the way through by acid at a nuclear plant.

 

The Davis-Besse plant, owned by FirstEnergy Corp., has been shut down 

for refueling since February. During that time, inspectors 

found that boric acid had eaten a hole in the thick cap that covers 

the reactor vessel.

 

The damage has raised new questions about aging nuclear plants and 

whether they are being inspected closely enough.

 

Buying a new reactor head would probably keep the plant near Toledo 

closed longer and cost more money than if the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission approved FirstEnergy's plan to fix the damage.

 

FirstEnergy wants to remove all of the corrosion by cutting out a 

hole in the reactor head and welding a chunk of stainless steel into 

it.

 

William Bateman, chief of the NRC's materials engineering research 

section, said FirstEnergy would have a ``clearer path to success'' if 

it gave up the idea of trying to repair the reactor head.

 

On the Net:

 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission: http://www.nrc.gov

 

FirstEnergy: http://www.firstenergycorp.com



-------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Director, Technical

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/