[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: responsibility?
NPR this morning interviewed a woman from NY who ran into the Church of the
Nativity with food some weeks ago, apparently prolonging the standoff by her
"international" presence and supply of resources. She lamented the death of
one of the Palestinians who had been shot by an Israeli sniper a couple of
days ago. I wonder when it will occur to her that he could still be alive if
she hadn't run in there.
Jack Earley
Radiological Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent A King/KINGVA/CC01/INEEL/US [mailto:KINGVA@INEL.GOV]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:33 PM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: responsibility?
When extreme actions by an individual "cross the line" into the realm of
the illegal and inhumane, I think the "group" has an obligation to condemn
the action as wrong and make it clear such actions are not acceptable. If
the group says nothing, public perception is that they implicitly condone
the extremist activities.
And to go a step further, if the group provides aid of any kind (financial
or otherwise) to individuals performing such acts, then they are indeed
supporting that type activity and share the guilt.
(In light of the above, I have not detected PETA condemning or distancing
itself from extremist individuals. I would suggest that PETA's
communications coordinator make PETA's views on such activities abundantly
clear to the public. As far as the extremists, I am not interested in the
message of anyone who injures or destroys to try to get their "message"
across.)
Vincent King,
Idaho Falls
Many "groups" - antinuclear, pro-life,
pro-animal rights, militaristic and white supremacist, pro-Palestinian
rights, etc. - may or may not be responsible for some violent or illegal
actions of their members. If the group whips people up into a fervor and
says "we must act!", and some members take that to mean "I should do
anything necessary to bring about change, including hurting someone", is
the
"group" ultimately responsible? Were they speaking responsibly and some
individuals acted wrongly, or were they playing shadow games and trying to
dodge the consequences? Tough question in all cases.
Mike
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/