[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 epirad@mchsi.com wrote:
> Just for the record then, how do your treatments account
> for non-linear dependecies within and between counties,
> especially since you are using averaged data for a
> county?
>
> Please be specific.
--I don't understand your question. Please make a specific
suggestion for a possible confounder and its
possible dependencies within and between counties.
>
> Concerning the r-squared value. The fact remains, you
> are able to predict only a small percentage of the lung
> cancer mortality using your smoking rates regardless of
> the cause of your low r-squared value.
--Smoking cannot explain the statistical fluctuations which
dominate thr R-squared value when the variation in smoking among counties
is small percentage-wise. Please see my paper in Health Physics
72:489-490;1997 to understand this problem.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/