RadSafe Archive Mail Index June, 2002

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Radiation Protection Dosimetry contents (0) E.P. Goldfinch
  
• Isotopes in natural environment (1) LAM HOI CHING
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Ted de Castro
  
• [Humor] Re: Chart New Element Discovered (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• RE: Welcome to California (1) Huston, Thomas E
  
• RE: Welcome to California (0) Wes Van Pelt
  
• Comment to CNN regarding KI (confessions (0) Erin Niven
  
• Re: Welcome to California (1) BLHamrick
  
• WHAT'S NEW - Friday, 31 May 02 (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• ICRP Proposals (0) Lars Persson
  
• Fw: new element discovered (Joke) (0) NeilKeeney
  
• Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nuclear T (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nucle (1) SAFarberMSPH
  
• Re: Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nucle (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Cohen's Ecologic Studies (3) epirad
  
• Re: Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nucle (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nucle (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Marco Caceci
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) EPIRAD
  
• Please help me make a table of rad facts (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Welcome to California( (1) Kerimbaev
  
• Re: Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nucle (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Welcome to California (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: Isotopes in natural environment (1) William V Lipton
  
• Columbus Alive (0) Zack Clayton
  
• RE: Welcome to California( (0) Wes Van Pelt
  
• re: Welcome to california (0) Zack Clayton
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Welcome to california (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (3) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Fw: new element discovered (Joke) (0) NeilKeeney
  
• RE: Conversion of Exposure to Dose (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• RE: Welcome to California (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Welcome to California (1) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: Welcome to California( (0) AndrewsJP
  
• Health Physics Director position (0) Michael Stabin
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Michael Stabin
  
• RE: Welcome to California (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Welcome to california (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (R-squared) (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (R-squared) (2) epirad
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Speercl
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (R-squared) (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• depth profiling with detectors (0) Minnema, Douglas
  
• Nez Perce denounce maverick scientist's (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Isotopes in natural environment (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Welcome to California (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• More "Adminstradium" (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Re: Harvey Wasserman - Comments on Nucle (0) Tomhaz
  
• RE: Welcome to California (1) Jack_Earley
  
• A DOE Question (0) Dave Biela
  
• Windows XP Compatible RESRAD Is Availabl (0) Yu, Charley
  
• [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: RE: Welcome to Californi (0) maury
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (R-squared) (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) maury
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (R-squared) (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Welcome to California (Kuehl's email (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Welcome to California (one more emai (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Sensory Perception of Radiation (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) epirad
  
• U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Analyti (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Neil, David M
  
• IEER's alternative to Yucca Mountain (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Welcome to California (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Welcome to California (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Hey, this doesn't seem fair... (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) maury
  
• HP position vacancy (0) Roger.Moroney
  
• RE: Hey, this doesn't seem fair... (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Welcome to California (one more emai (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Welcome to California (electricity) (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Welcome to California (1) Ted de Castro
  
• update on EPA rulemaking on 316(b) - fis (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Welcome to California (2) Phil Rutherford
  
• RE: Welcome to California (0) Marco Caceci
  
• RE: Welcome to California (1) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Re: Welcome to California - Aha! (2) Michael Stabin
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) maury
  
• " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, celebri (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, cel (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Welcome to California - Aha! (0) maury
  
• RE: Welcome to California (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Hey, this doesn't seem fair... (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Hey, this doesn't seem fair... (0) Neil, David M
  
• Position Available: Radiation Safety Spe (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) NeilKeeney
  
• yucca "fact of the week" (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RE: " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, cel (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (2) epirad
  
• RE: " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, cel (0) Jim Darrough
  
• RE: " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, cel (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (3) epirad
  
• Re: Welcome to California - Aha! (0) Tosh Ushino, CHP
  
• Re: Welcome to California (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Help with instrument description please (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (2) Gary Isenhower
  
• IH Tech & SR RCTs Needed (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies, etc., etc. (1) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Roll Call Committee vote on Yucca Mounta (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• HP position available (0) Ron Buchanan
  
• Cohen's Ecologic Nonsense (1) Thomas Jones
  
• Chemist at Rad lab position available (0) Ron Buchanan
  
• Re: Epidemiology (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Nonsense (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Request for article (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) hflong
  
• Re: Request for article (0) maury
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Lack of Federal Opposition to Californi (0) Phil Rutherford
  
• Dumb questions and comments on ecologica (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Nonsense (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Epidemiology (0) Dov Brickner
  
• Re: Epidemiology (1) William V Lipton
  
• Colon CT dose (0) Keith Welch
  
• " FUEL CYCLE WORK SHIFTING TO CHEAPER RE (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, cel (1) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Nonsense (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Nonsense (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL TECHNICIAN POSITION (0) Fernandez, Vivian
  
• The DARI (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• RE: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Letter to HERA Editor (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• information on the E-520 (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: The DARI (0) SAFarberMSPH
  
• alarms (0) JOHN.RICH
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) epirad
  
• Trivial-Adam-Mohan Radiological Units (T (0) Paul_Prichard
  
• Effects of Tolerable Stress levels (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Trivial-Adam-Mohan Radiological Unit (0) gaxt
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (1) epirad
  
• Re: " Avoid Yucca for nuclear waste, cel (0) Norman Cohen
  
• MSNBC & Yucca Mountain: Nuclear waste: (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: chloroform and threshold (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Thanks - request for images and CNN (0) Erin Niven
  
• FW: 133-Ba dose calibrator source (0) Page, Barry
  
• Re:natural isotopes measured by WBC-comp (0) LAM HOI CHING
  
• Re: natural isotopes measured by WBC-com (1) JBa3965388
  
• The "Blue Book" (1) Christopher W. Becker
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: The "Blue Book" (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Trivial-Adam-Mohan Radiological Unit (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (1) epirad
  
• AOPA Concludes GA Aircraft No Threat to (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (1) epirad
  
• A question of statistical significance v (0) maury
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (1) epirad
  
• Question on USSR reactor accident (0) goldinem
  
• meeting on Moab Utah site remediation (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Emergency Responder List (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Radon cancer fears dismissed (0) Frederic Dawson
  
• RE: Radon cancer fears dismissed (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: Radon cancer fears dismissed (0) epirad
  
• Radon dose conversion factor (1) LAM HOI CHING
  
• Re: Radon dose conversion factor (0) Frederic Dawson
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Dumb questions and comments on ecolo (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Position opening in Radiation Safety at (0) Darlene Manley
  
• Russia: Supermodel Astronauts Wanted- Se (0) SAFarberMSPH
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Cohen ecologic nonsense (3) Thomas Jones
  
• Re: Cohen ecologic nonsense (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• US 'foils terror attack' (1) Frederic Dawson
  
• Re: Cohen ecologic findings (0) Michael Stabin
  
• Fwd: Dirty Bomb (1) BobCherry
  
• Re: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) epirad
  
• Re: US 'foils terror attack' (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: Fwd: Dirty Bomb (0) Fritz Strydom
  
• Re: US 'foils terror attack' (0) Tony Harrison
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (1) epirad
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) SAFarberMSPH
  
• Dirty bomb - finally! (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Fwd: Dirty Bomb (0) john grant
  
• RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies (0) epirad
  
• steam gen tube rupture in S Korea nuke (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (0) maury
  
• Re: Cohen refutation of LNT (0) hflong
  
• Re: Dirty bomb - finally! (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Dirty bomb - finally! (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) AndrewsJP
  
• Isotopes in cyclotron (0) LAM HOI CHING
  
• Who knows Mr. Dusan Radosavljevic (0) Dave Biela
  
• Deleted Uranium (0) LassePer
  
• natural dose (1) M Nivas
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (1) epirad
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (2) epirad
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (2) epirad
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) Pombier, Edward C.
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) epirad
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) Somerville, Mark
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• RE: A question of statistical significan (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) Pombier, Edward C.
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Radiation (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• Ac-227 electroplated disk source (1) yong zhu
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) epirad
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (1) AndrewsJP
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• The Radon Debate (0) William Prestwich
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) Chilton, Milton W.
  
• RE: Ac-227 electroplated disk source (0) Scott Stafford
  
• Re: Ac-227 electroplated disk source (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (2) AndrewsJP
  
• Re: Ac-227 electroplated disk source (1) yong zhu
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) AndrewsJP
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Radon Debate (0) greg johnstone
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (1) epirad
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (0) maury
  
• Re: natural dose question (0) John Cameron
  
• The Goiania case is useful to study for (0) John Cameron
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) Chilton, Milton W.
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (0) epirad
  
• Surviving a Dirty Bomb (2) Susan McElrath
  
• Re: Radon Debate (0) epirad
  
• RES: Dirty Bomb - CNN Accuracy? (0) John Hunt
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: natural dose (1) M Nivas
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (1) John M Priest Jr
  
• RE: Ac-227 electroplated disk source (0) Charles Migliore
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Alfonso
  
• RES: Dirty Bombs and Goiania (0) John Hunt
  
• Video Radiation: Fact and Myth is availa (0) John Cameron
  
• subscribe to abolition global caucus yah (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Transuranics Definition (0) Dave Biela
  
• More on Sensory Perception of Radiation (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Risk of fear (0) Steven J Piet/PIETSJ/CC01/INEEL/US
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) hflong
  
• Re: A question of statistical significan (0) epirad
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) hflong
  
• Arming Mechanisms Auctioned for $167,500 (1) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Interactive Used Nuclear Fuel Routing Ma (1) Richard F. Orthen
  
• RE: Interactive Used Nuclear Fuel Routin (0) Fleming, Kenneth N.
  
• Re: The Goiania case is useful to study (0) james.g.barnes
  
• "Dirty bombs" - request for facts (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Arming Mechanisms Auctioned for $167 (0) john grant
  
• Re: Interactive Used Nuclear Fuel Routin (0) john grant
  
• RE: dirty bomb (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Colleges Could Yield 'Dirty' Bomb Materi (0) BLHamrick
  
• EPD's and RF (3) John R Laferriere
  
• RE: Interactive Used Nuclear Fuel Routin (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bomb" (2) Tim
  
• RE: Arming Mechanisms Auctioned for $167 (0) Minnema, Douglas
  
• Re: Interactive Used Nuclear Fuel Routin (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Re: EPD's and RF (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• re: the inaccurate maps site (4) Zack Clayton
  
• Dirty Bomb (0) Ed Kaplan
  
• Re: BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bom (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bom (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: the inaccurate maps site "ditto" (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• RE: Arming Mechanisms Auctioned for $167 (0) Minnema, Douglas
  
• Re: BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bom (0) maury
  
• Re: the inaccurate maps site (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: the inaccurate maps site (0) maury
  
• re: the inaccurate maps site (0) Kenny Peskin
  
• Re: BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bom (0) maury
  
• RE: the inaccurate maps site (0) Mercado, Don
  
• RE: Arming Mechanisms Auctioned for $167 (0) Kolb, William (WKOLB)
  
• The Kitchen Table Atom Bomb...review (0) AndrewsJP
  
• Re: EPD's and RF (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: The Kitchen Table Atom Bomb...review (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Mururoa plutonium [was The Kitchen (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Mururoa plutonium [was The Kitchen (0) Bud Yard
  
• RE: EPD's and RF (0) Scott Stafford
  
• FW: Oak Ridge Positions Available (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Re: The Kitchen Table Atom Bomb...review (0) Speercl
  
• "Oops, I did it, again." (medical misadm (1) William V Lipton
  
• Terrorism involving radioactive material (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• The Nation article on nuke plant securit (0) Norman Cohen
  
• 40 CFR Part 193 (0) Ralph E. Wild
  
• RE: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (1) Scott, Bob A
  
• Re: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (1) William V Lipton
  
• article on Moab Utah Uranium Tailings (0) Norman Cohen
  
• IH Specialist Position Available (0) Stephanie Long
  
• RE: More on Sensory Perception of Radiat (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: the inaccurate maps site (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Nuclear Terrorism-NPR-Science Friday (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Re: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (1) Tomhaz
  
• RE: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (1) Larson, Kaye M BAMC-Ft Sam Houston
  
• RE: article on Moab Utah Uranium Tailing (0) Kent, Michael D.
  
• Re: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Terrorism involving radioactive mate (0) maury
  
• RE: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• Fwd: The Nation article on nuke plant se (0) SAFarberMSPH
  
• FW: More on Sensory Perception of Radiat (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: More on Sensory Perception of Radiat (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• In need of transport company recommendat (0) Shane Connor
  
• RE: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Patient Release Guidance (0) Perrero, Daren
  
• Re: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Tomhaz
  
• RE: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) Larson, Kaye M BAMC-Ft Sam Houston
  
• Re: More on Sensory Perception of Radiat (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• RE: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Randall_F_Brich
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb -Agenda Journ (0) SAFarberMSPH
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Don Jordan
  
• Aug 2002 HP Journal TOC (0) BABusby
  
• Re: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) LAM HOI CHING
  
• Re: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) rozental
  
• RE: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) AndrewsJP
  
• RE: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: "Oops, I did it, again." (medical mi (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: article on Moab Utah Uranium Tailing (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Swipe tests (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Mike and Lynn \(Raymond-\) Empey
  
• Re: Swipe tests (0) BLHamrick
  
• UN2982 Question (0) Tad Blanchard
  
• Re: Swipe tests (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Epidemiology (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Epidemiology (0) epirad
  
• Re: Pu contact dose rates (0) Kerimbaev
  
• Re: Pu contact dose rates (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Pu contact dose rates (0) Kerimbaev
  
• RE: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Scott Flowerday
  
• MEETING, CABO FRIO RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZI (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Dose limits for emergency workers (was D (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Swipe tests (1) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Dose limits for emergency workers (w (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: Swipe tests (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• RE: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• RE: Dose limits for emergency workers (w (1) Morgan, Ben
  
• Looking for employment (0) COBDW
  
• Re: Swipe tests (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Pu contact dose rates (0) Minnema, Douglas
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Mike Lantz
  
• Re: Pu contact dose rates (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Pu contact dose rates (1) Minnema, Douglas
  
• RE: Pu contact dose rates (0) Erik F. Shores
  
• Fwd: Pu contact dose rates (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: The Nation article on nuke plant sec (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bom (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: BBC's "The Kitchen Table Nuclear Bom (0) JGinniver
  
• Deadly deceit - low level radiation High (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: Dose limits for emergency workers (w (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• HP question - alpha sources (2) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• FFTF NEWS (0) Randall_F_Brich
  
• HP question - alpha sources (0) Charles Migliore
  
• RE: HP question - alpha sources[Scanned] (0) Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (1) Bud Yard
  
• Questions about decontamination (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: HP question - alpha sources (0) Michael Kay
  
• RE: HP question - alpha sources - THANKS (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: HP question - alpha sources (0) Bradshaw, Keith
  
• RE: Questions about decontamination (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Irradiation damage from alphas to plasti (0) Kerimbaev
  
• Emergency preparedness resource (0) Tony Harrison
  
• RE: Questions about decontamination (0) Don Jordan
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (1) maury
  
• Judge says SC must allow Pu shipments (0) Phil Hypes
  
• Re: HP question - alpha sources - THANKS (0) John Johnson
  
• Columbia U study supports LNT (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Fwd: (CMEP-list) Yucca Mountain NATIONAL (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: Columbia U study supports LNT (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: HP question - alpha sources - THANKS (0) John Johnson
  
• Re: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) William V Lipton
  
• EPRI study: reactor containment protect (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• U.S. residents can sue for nuke exposure (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• State of Utah Tax Petetion for Envirocar (0) Claude Laney
  
• Re: State of Utah Tax Petetion for Envir (0) gilsondg
  
• Rad Sources for Workshops (1) Wade Miller Jr.
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Emer, Dudley
  
• Re: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) Bud Yard
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (2) maury
  
• sources (0) Boomologist
  
• new radiation monitoring device ? (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Paul_Prichard
  
• RE: Columbia U study supports LNT (2) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Scott, Andrew L CPT AMEDDCS
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) Scott, Andrew L CPT AMEDDCS
  
• Re: State of Utah Tax Petetion for Envir (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: new radiation monitoring device ? (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Re: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Brian Rees
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) maury
  
• RE: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) Hall, David A.
  
• Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Ed Stroud
  
• Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops Don't Open (0) Michael Kay
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb (0) William V Lipton
  
• HPS Taking lead on relating risks of dir (0) Rob Gunter
  
• Licensing and Use of Smoke Detectors (1) Perrero, Daren
  
• Lochbaum on OSRE's (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) Jim Hoerner
  
• RE: EPRI study: reactor containment pro (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Licensing and Use of Smoke Detectors (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) William V Lipton
  
• BERTRAND GOLDSCHMIDT, PIONEER OF FRENCH (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Female X-ray techs exposed to smaller do (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Breast Cancer Study (1) Thomas Jones
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• PCM-2 (0) Estabrooks, Bates (IHK)
  
• Dirty Bomb Cartoons (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Lochbaum on OSRE's (1) Tim
  
• Re: Lochbaum on OSRE's (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: new radiation monitoring device ? (0) Sonter Mark
  
• Neutron transmission through boronated c (0) Janette Atkinson
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (1) RuthWeiner
  
• California Legislation (1) Phil Rutherford
  
• Re: California Legislation (0) maury
  
• Re: California Legislation (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Licensing and Use of Smoke Detectors (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: California Legislation (0) Glow_Worm
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Tomhaz
  
• Re: EPRI study: reactor containment pro (0) Tomhaz
  
• " STUDY SHOWS NO CANCER EFFECTS IN PORT (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: EPRI study: reactor containment pro (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Radwaste Broker/Project Manager Wanted (0) John O'Neil
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (0) roseb
  
• RE: EPRI study: reactor containment pro (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (1) John Johnson
  
• RE: EPRI study: reactor containment pro (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) Shane Connor
  
• Re: EPRI study: reactor containment pro (0) maury
  
• international dose limits (2) Engelhardt and Associates
  
• Re: Breast Cancer Study (1) hflong
  
• Re: " STUDY SHOWS NO CANCER EFFECTS IN P (0) William Prestwich
  
• RE: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (0) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• Re: Re: Breast Cancer Study (1) Thomas Jones
  
• Danger from Am-241 compared to other eve (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• decontamination (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• NCRP FOUNDATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL RADON S (0) Thomas Jones
  
• Re: international dose limits (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Missing: Soviet radioactive dust (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• [Fwd: What's New for Jun 21, 2002] (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Breast Cancer Study (1) Brian Rees
  
• Re: international dose limits (0) John Johnson
  
• Re: Breast Cancer Study (0) hflong
  
• Re: Danger from Am-241 compared to other (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Re: international dose limits (0) Phil Rutherford
  
• Re: international dose limits (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Radioactive contamination in drinking wa (0) F.Z.Khiari
  
• Re: Radioactive contamination in drinkin (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• CDC: No incr thyr risk w/rad dose at Han (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• RE: Breast Cancer Study (0) Dov Brickner
  
• Re: NCRP FOUNDATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL RAD (0) epirad
  
• RE: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: CDC: No incr thyr risk w/rad dose at (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Hanford and the HTDS (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Hanford and the HTDS (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Rad Sources for Workshops (1) Marthaller, Chris
  
• Re: Rad Sources for Workshops (0) William V Lipton
  
• radioactive sparkplugs! (0) Sharyn Mathews
  
• RE: Licensing and Use of Smoke Detectors (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• Re: Hanford and the HTDS (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Columbia U study supports LNT (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• RE: Hanford and the HTDS -- a few correc (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Hanford and the HTDS -- a few correc (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Nuclear Screensaver (0) atw Editorship
  
• RE: Hanford and the HTDS -- a few correc (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• Job Posting Announcements (1) TConley
  
• Re: NCRP FOUNDATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL RAD (0) John Moulder
  
• FW: An HP Position Open in Texas [Uraniu (0) Robert Free
  
• National Geographic on Nuclear Waste (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: NCRP FOUNDATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL RAD (0) epirad
  
• Re: NCRP FOUNDATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL RAD (0) epirad
  
• Re: National Geographic on Nuclear Waste (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Radon-222 and Radon-220 (thoron) Measure (1) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Unwanted Source Test Jigs & Automated So (0) BIC
  
• Borrowing a RANDO phantom (0) Chan-Hyeong Kim
  
• shielding software (0) Sugarman, Steve
  
• Shipping Question (4) Ed Stroud
  
• Exposure of Indigenous people to radiati (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Dose Range Calibrators (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: Shipping Question (0) lavelyp
  
• CANDU in the US and "using water economi (0) Michael Stabin
  
• NUREG 1492 (0) Perrero, Daren
  
• RE: Shipping Question (0) Tom Morgan
  
• BOUNCE radsafe@"list.vanderbilt.edu": (0) owner-radsafe
  
• UNSUBSCRIBE radsafe "Coronado, Lisa (OD/ (0) Majordomo
  
• Re: Surviving a Dirty Bomb -- National A (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Shipping Question (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Job Posting Announcements (1) William V Lipton
  
• Indigenous doses (0) Scott, Arthur (MOL)
  
• Re: Shipping Question My guess (0) Michael Kay
  
• [shipping question] question (0) Aggie_Barlow
  
• RE: Shipping Question (0) Somerville, Mark
  
• Hanford Thyroid Risk Study Released (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Viking 5000 MCA Card (0) Michael Stabin
  
• Re: Shipping Question (0) Carol S. Marcus
  
• Search previous issues of Health Physics (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Once upon a time, many years ago II (0) maury
  
• Re: Radon-222 and Radon-220 (thoron) Mea (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• A critique of the article on radioactive (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Once upon a time, many years ago II (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Shipping Question (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Letter to NYT on Yucca Nuclear Waste Shi (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Council calls for halt to reactor plans (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Do low dose-rate bystander effects influ (2) epirad
  
• 2003 Mid-Year Meeting in San Antonio: He (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Breast Cancer High in X-ray Techs Before (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• MEDHP-SEC: Re: Breast Cancer High in X-r (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: MEDHP-SEC: Re: Breast Cancer High in (1) Gibbs, S Julian
  
• Re: MEDHP-SEC: Re: Breast Cancer High in (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Do Low Dose-rate Bystander Effects I (0) David W Lee
  
• RE: MEDHP-SEC: Re: Breast Cancer High in (2) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: MEDHP-SEC: Re: Breast Cancer High in (1) Gibbs, S Julian
  
• Re: MEDHP-SEC: Re: Breast Cancer High in (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Ingestion of AmO2 (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Do Low Dose-rate Bystander Effects I (0) epirad
  
• Neutron Shielding (0) Ayers, Rex G
  
• Re: neutron shielding (0) JPreisig
  
• New study: British baby deaths- Chernoby (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• RE: Shipping Question (1) Toli Mikell
  
• RE: Shipping Question (0) mark sasser
  
• Old Uranium Kit????? (0) Glow_Worm
  
• dirty bomb (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: neutron shielding (0) Ayers, Rex G
  
• RE: Job Posting Announcements (1) Marco Caceci
  
• RE: neutron shielding (0) Ziegler, Susanne E.
  
• " Choosing routes, testing safety " [FW] (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Health Physics Society, Radiation Specia (0) sandyfl
  
• U.S. lacks coordinated strategy on nucle (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Job Posting Announcements (0) Jim Nicolosi
  
• America -- The Fearful (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Breast Cancer Study (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• RE: Job Posting Announcements (0) Marty.Bourquin
  
• RE: Breast Cancer Study (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Job Opportunities in support of the Yucc (0) Bill_Carl
  
• U.S. Senate bill to aid nuclear weapon d (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (1) John Johnson
  
• Re: Shipping Question (0) Braggj
  
• Dr. Alice Stewart dies (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Dr Alice Stewart dies (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Stability of tritiated thymidine (2) Arvic Harms
  
• Looking to Obtain Copy of a Book (0) Musolino, Stephen
  
• Re: Stability of tritiated thymidine (0) Jim Nicolosi
  
• RE: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• Re: Stability of tritiated thymidine (0) D J Hornsey
  
• Re: Dr Alice Stewart dies (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Czech-Austria nuclear row looms before E (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: dirty bomb (2) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: dirty bomb (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: dirty bomb (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Link for the Alice Stewart article (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Normal Uranium or Natural Uranium? (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: dirty bomb (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• SR RCT's Needed Immediately (0) Stephanie Long
  
• RE: dirty bomb (0) Tony Harrison
  
• Armenian nuclear power plant shuts down (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) Sandy Perle
  
• NAP Book- Technology for Countering Ter (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Haelth Physics Manuals of Good Practice (0) Larry Boing
  
• job posting (0) Michael Dupray
  
• RE: dirty bomb (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: dirty bomb (0) Tony Harrison
  
• RE: dirty bomb (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Cleanup won't end nuclear waste site (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Looking for a 1-2 day training session o (0) Chan-Hyeong Kim
  
• Full-body disagreement (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Breast Cancer Prevention with Radiat (0) hflong
  
• Re: Breast Cancer Study (0) hflong
  
• FW: Fire Department position on Spent Fu (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• In a Sign of the Times, the City Begins (0) Sandy Perle
  
• EPA Methods for Water (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• Nuclear Dump Disrupts a Peaceful Taiwan (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: dirty bomb (0) BLHamrick