[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cohen's Ecologic Studies
I don't know why you guys refuse to face the issue. You argue that
ecological studies have certain limitations. No one disputes that. You
keep describing what these potential problems are. No argument. But no one
has shown how, with a specific, credible example, such a problem could
dispute the actual data Dr. Cohen has presented.
This is like arguing that a clock might not give the right time. It might
not have been wound. Or reset after winding. Or be in the wrong time zone.
Or be a lousy clock. All true. But when a guy says "My clock says the time
is now 8:15,' do you sit around and present the kind of arguments I
described, or do you check out the specifics? What Cohen keeps asking for
is: Give me an example of a credible situation that could reverse his
negative correlation. He agrees to calculate the results, so you don't even
have to do any work.
Seems like a reasonable request.
Ted Rockwell
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/