Re: NCRP FOUNDATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL RADON STANDARD

[epirad@mchsi.com]

Thomas,



I believe the report http://www.ncrp.com/review.html

was released by the NCRP and is not the work of a 

hacker.  The report has some good sections, but in my 

opinion is extremely outdated and adds very little new 

information to our current knowlwdge on radon risks.  In 

fact, some sections misrepresent our current 

understanding of residential radon risks. One of the two 

references to me in the document is apparently from a 

post on Radsafe.  I would urge the committee to include 

only published peer reviewed literature in their reports 

and not posts from lists. 



I urge Radsafers to comment on the document. 



Regards, Bill Field

> 

> http://www.ncrp.com/review.html

> 

> This report must be the result of a hacker.  The NCRP is not serious 

> about this report laying the foundation for an occupational radon 

> standard are they?  

> 

> If this is the scientific foundation, I anticiapte many lawsuits. 

> 

> This is the most archaic draft I have ever seen the NCRP produce.  

> 

> Thomas Jones

> 

> Sent by Law  Mail

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/