[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recommendation for new format
No thank-you.
Sounds like an even older fashioned BBS format!!
I prefer the ASCII based RADSAFE which I have no trouble accessing from
anywhere.
I'd rather not have HTML or attachments which limits the breadth of
equipment with which I can access this information - nor do I feel that
HTML adds a thing.
"Marthaller, Chris" wrote:
>
> I would have to veto that idea, since many of us are limited to what
> we can access on the web. The way our system works, in order for me to
> access the board the computer security personnel would have to grant access
> to all boards at that site. That, at this site is not going to happen.
> Violations of "official use policy," don't you know.
>
> Chris A. Marthaller, RRPT
> Sr. Training Coordinator, WIPP
> (505) 234-8661
> Chris.Marthaller@wipp.ws
> I alone am to blame for my statements.
> "If we keep doing what we are doing, we will keep getting what we are
> getting." ANON
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert.Loesch@eh.doe.gov [mailto:Robert.Loesch@eh.doe.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:47 AM
> To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: Recommendation for new format
>
> I'd like to poll the radsafers on their thoughts about interest in a new
> look and feel to this popular list. Listservers are OLD technology and
> have many drawbacks (in my opinion) that are easily avoidable. I'd like to
> suggest that the sponsor for radsafe consider switching to a discussion
> board format that is web-based. For an example, see the discussion board
> of my local bass fishing club (
> http://fishonbassclub.com/FOBA/wwwboard/wwwboard.html). I believe that
> this would have the following advantages: you can following the board even
> when on travel or at home since it's not tied to a particular email
> address; no subscribing or unsubscribing; you don't get inundated with
> hugh amounts of email or long digests that are hard to follow; threads are
> self organized so you can easily pick and choose which ones to follow (or
> not); most disscussion board software allow for inclusion of html code to
> allow for hotlinks and even pictures. I would prefer this format and
> wondered how you would feel?
>
> Bob Loesch
> US Dept of Energy
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/