[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: maximum permissible limits



Franz



I will attempt to give you what I think is the Canadian position.



The CNSC does not have MPC or intake limits. Total effective doses to

workers (as calculated from in vivo or in vitro monitoring use ICRP or other

approvel models) are compared to the limits in the regulations (these are

based on ICRP Publication 60).



The CNSC's working group on internal dosimetry is reviewing a proposal to

use personal air samplers instead of bioassay when bioassay is not sensitive

enough to meet the current regulatory requirements (example; natural

uranium).



I doubt if the above is of any relavance to Austria, but I hope it is of

some use.



Regards



John

________________

John R Johnson

4535 West 9th Ave.

Vancouver, B. C.

V6R 2E2

(604) 222-9840

idias@interchange.ubc.ca









----- Original Message -----

From: "Franz Schoenhofer" <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>

To: "radsafe@list. vanderbilt. edu (E-mail)" <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:58 PM

Subject: Fw: maximum permissible limits





I have only received two comments on my question, which did not answer it. I

do believe that this question must be of really fundamental interest to

anybody, who is checking data for compliance with legal prescription.

Please, if you do not want to answer to the list, answer to me personally.

So I post my question once again.



Franz





----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------

>This comment raises for me a very important question: What is the

criterion,

>whether a maximum permíssible concentration has been exceeded? There are

two

>extremes possible: Is it, that the measured value plus x sigma has to be

>below the MPC or is it that the measured value has to be below the MPC plus

>x sigma? The latter criterion is used in most regulations in Austria

>regarding contaminants in food (x=2). The criterion defined by the Austrian

>Standardisation Organisation (which has to be regarded as a recommendation

>and has no real legislative power) is coherent with the first extreme. I

>wonder, what the legislation is in other countries.

>

>Best regards,

>

>Franz

>#

>

>

>

>************************************************************************

>You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

>send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

>radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

>

>





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/











************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/