[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Truck accident overreaction.



Todd and all,

"Anti-nucs (mostly) believe -" I agree. At meetings of Citizens Against a Radioactive Environment (CARE) at LLNat Lab, I heard a hundred concerned members listen to 3 Mile Island fear-mongering, not countered by the half-dozen LLNL people there.

My own brief comment about hormesis was ignored.



I believe that when (not if)  c<1 mrem/hour is widely used as a health supplement, like vitamins, the public will learn more and have less fear because less will be the unknown to them.

Who would have thought, a hundred yesrs ago, that we would accept >95% of adult Americans controlling a hundred horses going a mile a minute within a few feet of us?

Howard Long



Todd Brautigam wrote:



> All,

>

> The truth may very well be that the overreaction was simply by one or two people... the dispatcher and/or the initial responder (police/fire officer). The news reporter simply reported what happened without bias and the anti-nukes used the opportunity to further their cause.

>

> The frustrating thing we, as health physics professionals, have to deal with is the persistent dilemma of the public being afraid of what they don't understand, and not wanting to understand what scares them. It is a true catch-22.

>

> The reality is that the anti-nukes (mostly) believe they are doing right. They don't continue the controversy for personal gain. For whatever reason, they don't trust the ones that know or are at least at the forefront of the "I don't want to know" group.

>

> Of course all these thoughts are my personal opinions and should be taken as such, but I thought I would throw them out for comment.

>

> Todd

>

> The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly

> confidential.  They may not be disclosed to someone who is not a named

> or authorized recipient.  They may also be subject to legal

> professional privilege and unauthorized disclosure, copying or use is

> prohibited.

>

> If you receive this e-mail in error please notify the sender by

> replying using the words Misdirected E-mail in the subject, and  then

> delete the message and any attachments from your system.

>

> Although this e-mail and any attachments have been scanned for

> viruses, the success of scanning products is not guaranteed. The

> recipient(s) should therefore carry out any checks that they believe

> to be appropriate in this respect.

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/