Re: Truck carrying 'low-level' radioactive tools crashes

[Muckerheide <muckerheide@attbi.com>]

Either way, neither Boxer nor her "moneyed constituents" would succeed if

they weren't fed the distortions by US!



As Ted Rockwell has said repeatedly: "The $100s Billions don't 'go down some

rat-hole,' they go into some rat's pocket."



The SOURCE of this fiction that Boxer et al., are only to willing to follow

is grounded in the scientific misconduct. Address the root: You could kill

Boxer and would do no good! You could kill the source of the distortions and

the rats and cockroaches would have no place to hide!



Blaming the "media" and the "politicians" is simply another disconnect to

keep from getting at the source / root of the problem.



IF we want change, we need to target the perpetrators, not the facilitators,

no matter HOW MUCH they are WILLING dupes, including many "HPs" and the HPS!



In 1987, and on many other occasions, Marshall Brucer himself said in the

HPS Newsletter itself: "After World War II, almost 20 articles per year

mentioned a hormetic effect in spite of a budding fallout hysteria. Health

Physicists soon learned that their livelihood depended upon scaring the

pants off Congress."



And: "Every Genetics budget meeting, from 1955 to 1981 opened its request

for funds with an anti-nuclear litany. In spite of this atmosphere, during

the 1960šs and 1970šs, about 40 articles per year described hormesis. In

1963, the AEC repeatedly confirmed lower mortality in guinea pigs, rats and

mice irradiated at low dose. In 1964, the cows exposed to about 150 rads

after the Trinity A-Bomb in 1946 were quietly euthenized because of extreme

old age." 



And. re Don Luckey's 1981 book (and 1982 HPJ paper on hormesis): "In 1983,

M. Brucer published an article in the Health Physics Newsletter entitled

'Radiation is Good For You,' and over 200 reprint requests indicated

agreement with his position."



See:

http://cnts.wpi.edu/RSH/docs/OtherDocs/Brucer87HPSNL.html



People can not get cost-effective LDR treatments because the health benefits

are/have been suppressed by FDA, NCI, et al., on behalf of the

pharmaceutical companies. Relevant research and researchers are suppressed.



We will make no difference until we target the "scientific misconduct" of

the criminals that perpetrate this fraud. (Government employees are "held

harmless" under the law, but the (private, including university grantees,

etc.) "feeders-at-the-trough" are not! But the gov't employees of EPA, DOE,

et al., have no hope of doing this alone. Their power comes from the ability

to hold $millions in cold cash in front of willing participants!



(Do you think the clear statements of RICO apply? Certainly the interlocking

nature of the research and policy bodies make the fundamental "Organization"

factors?) 



Regards, Jim





on 8/17/02 3:00 PM, BLHamrick@aol.com at BLHamrick@aol.com wrote:



> In a message dated 08/17/2002 11:26:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

> muckerheide@attbi.com writes:

> 

> 

>> Bottom line: "Boxer is gullible." She is a victim of the officials that know

>> better, but do not tell the truth. We need to focus on the real problem, or

>> we can't make any progress. Even if you get to Boxer, that wouldn't stop

>> NCRP from conning someone else. The truth needs to be articulated by the

>> people that know better; and the light must be shined on the source of the

>> 

> 

> I'm sorry, but I totally disagree.  Boxer and State Senators Kuehl, Romero et

> al follow the money, and in California that money leads to Hollywood and

> Malibu.  They don't care one whit what any "expert" has to say on the matter,

> because if it makes their monied constituency happy to fight the evils of

> radiation, then who needs anything more?  The truth is irrelevant.

> 

> Barbara

> 



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/