[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Another Note about the ORNL Ir-192 Incident



 
Folks --
 
Today Harry Anagnostopoulos provided an excellent summary of the deposition and detection aspects of a melted Ir-192 source in Louisiana. He noted that the melted Ir-192 tended to stick to the surfaces it landed on and that detection with a pancake probe worked best.
 
To compare the Louisiana experience with the ORNL (Oak Ridge) experience, as I recall the ORNL particles were not sticky. I assumed this was because they were not melted and fell mostly on the concrete reactor bay floor. This may also have had something to do with their composition, which escapes my memory at the moment. At any rate, they were indeed somewhat air-dispersible in their fragmented form.
 
Also, these particles, fairly fresh from the reactor, had a very high specific activity. So even small bits were very hot, both radioactively and themally. At least one was located by the use of a heat sensor (thermal detector) with a real-time imaging device. Others were detected through a window high up in the reactor bay, using a collimated detector. These methods saved dose by allowing remote detection to within inches prior to "nailing down" the exact locations with regular detectors and picking up the particles. One problem was that until the cask was removed, the background in the bay was high and so the detection of the individual particles was more difficult.
 
                                            Janet Westbrook