RadSafe Archive Mail Index September, 2002

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Re: Low Level Radiation Campaign (0) Tom O'Dou
  
• Re: HEU in Yugoslavia, (0) Speercl
  
• Re/ HEU in Yugoslavia (0) Emil
  
• Safety Culture:"At this time, we plan to (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Dual Radionuclide Stress Test (2) Tom O'Dou
  
• Re: Dual Radionuclide Stress Test (0) Sandy Perle
  
• FW: talk to journos (1) Sonter Mark
  
• Re: talk to journos (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: FW: talk to journos (3) RuthWeiner
  
• Feedback - Land of culture and safety cu (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: radium dial watches (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: radium dial watches (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: talk to journos (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: Dual Radionuclide Stress Test (0) Jim Nicolosi
  
• Japan Nuclear energy policies to stay in (0) Sandy Perle
  
• No link between mobile phones and tumour (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: Serbian nuclear fuel, facts (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: FYI: Global Education... (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Dual Radionuclide Stress Test (0) Joel L Lazewatsky
  
• talk to journos (0) Johansen, Kjell
  
• Re: FW: talk to journos (1) Tom Hazlett
  
• Animal radon studies (1) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: No link between mobile phones and tu (1) John Moulder
  
• "- To Their Faces" at Doctors for Disast (0) hflong
  
• RE: Animal radon studies (0) Philippe Duport
  
• Radioactive Boy Scout (was RE: talk to j (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Animal radon studies (0) epirad
  
• RE: Dual Radionuclide Stress Test (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Dual Radionuclide Stress Test (0) Mark How
  
• RE: FW: talk to journos (0) Chilton, Milton W.
  
• Re: No link between mobile phones and tu (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Health Physicist/Rad Engineer Position i (0) Debby Shonka
  
• SNF transp. could withstand Baltimore ra (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Mystery Am-241 Source (0) Roy Parker
  
• Re: No link between mobile phones and tu (1) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Job Opportunity (0) Auroba.L.Al-Samaraee
  
• Re: Radioactive Boy Scout (was RE: talk (0) Julie_F_Shafer
  
• Defending science (0) niobe smith
  
• Re: talk to journos / radioactive boy sc (0) P. van Rooijen
  
• Re: FW: talk to journos (0) William V Lipton
  
• Pakistan to set up 2 nuclear power plant (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: No link between mobile phones and tu (2) Dov Brickner
  
• RE: FW: talk to journos (0) Kent, Michael D.
  
• Wash. Times Article re Nuclear Power (0) Estabrooks, Bates (IHK)
  
• Dual-isotope cardiac scanning (0) Gibbs, S Julian
  
• Help! Need view of Sandia Phantom test (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Naturally occurring Pu-244 (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Re: No link between mobile phones and tu (1) Muckerheide
  
• Re: No link between mobile phones and tu (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• RE: Naturally occurring Pu-244 (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Help! Need view of Sandia Phantom te (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Help! Need view of Sandia Phantom te (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Job Posting for RSO at Univ At Buffalo (0) Daniel Mackney
  
• GAO to investigate Davis Besse Messy (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RE: Naturally occurring Pu-244 (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Uses for non-medical nuclides (0) Brian Rees
  
• RE: Uses for non-medical nuclides (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• Low Energy X-rays (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Addresses for Radwaste Disposal Contract (0) Erick Lindstrom
  
• Update on Yugoslavian fuel (0) John Ahlquist
  
• Re: Uses for non-medical nuclides (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• http://www.worldnuclear.org/feature.cfm (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• X-Ray Diffraction Units (0) Eric Cieszkiewicz
  
• urls for toyko power nuke scandal (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: http://www.worldnuclear.org/feature. (1) JGinniver
  
• Fwd: Greenpeace: Nuclear Campaign Open H (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• The Isotopes (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: The Isotopes (0) Sonter Mark
  
• OFF! RE: The Isotopes (0) Rogers Brent
  
• Re: Greenpeace: Nuclear Campaign../New P (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• An HP Position is Open in Texas [License (0) Pete Myers
  
• GAO Opens DB Investigation (1) Richard F. Orthen
  
• JR, SR, & Lead RCTs needed - Cincinnati (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Naturally occurring Pu-244 (0) Duane Schmidt
  
• Re: Animal radon studies (0) Matthew&Elizabeth Rumick
  
• RE: Animal radon studies (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• RE: Animal radon studies (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• Looking for Cs calibration source (0) Keith Welch
  
• Re: http://www.worldnuclear.org/feature. (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (1) William V Lipton
  
• radwaste scaling factors (0) William V Lipton
  
• Positions Available - Current Wish List (1) Stephanie Long
  
• [Fwd: Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (2) William V Lipton
  
• HP Position (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• (no subject) (0) EMCTGA
  
• Another question re: dose (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Another question re: dose (1) John Johnson
  
• RE: Chemical state of Ir-192 sources (0) Tom Morgan
  
• A friend gave me sheet music for "Radium (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: Another question re: dose (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Chemical state of Ir-192 sources (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Another question re: dose (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Another question re: dose (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: A friend gave me sheet music for "Ra (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Chemical state of Ir-192 sources (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• Reactor jargon and acronyms (0) tristan
  
• variations in background (5) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: variations in background (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Ir-192 Dispersion (0) Janet Westbrook
  
• Re: variations in background (0) JOHN.RICH
  
• Re: variations in background (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: variations in background (0) Muckerheide
  
• RE: A friend gave me sheet music for "Ra (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• temporal? variations in background (2) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: A friend gave me sheet music for "Ra (0) Glow_Worm
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Another question re: dose (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (2) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: variations in background (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Sheet music for "Radium Dance" (1904) - (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• secondary calibration standards from NIS (0) F.Z.Khiari
  
• AW: temporal? variations in background (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Question: Which ear do you use for your (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• AW: Question: Which ear do you use for y (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: temporal? variations in background (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: Chemical state of Ir-192 sources (0) Sonter Mark
  
• Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Heat comment (Q: Which ear do you use fo (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: variations in background (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (0) epirad
  
• Re: Heat comment (Q: Which ear do you us (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Chemical state of Ir-192 sources (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Heat comment (Q: Which ear do you us (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (0) William V Lipton
  
• Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (0) Muckerheide
  
• Calabrese and Baldwin again (0) Muckerheide
  
• Baltimore-Washington Chapter HPS meeting (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Chemical state of Ir-192 sources (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• RE: Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (correcti (1) Emil
  
• RE: Another question re: dose (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: radwaste scaling factors (0) Emil
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (3) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Another question re: dose (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Heat comment (Q: Which ear do you us (1) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: temporal? variations in background (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (0) William V Lipton
  
• Next Generation of Nuke Reactors (0) Bob
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Water Wall Shields (0) Goff, Tom
  
• RE: Another question re: dose (1) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence [was GAO Opens (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Another question re: dose (0) William V Lipton
  
• Top TEPCO official allegedly ordered cov (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Another Note about the ORNL Ir-192 Incid (0) Janet Westbrook
  
• Looking for News about GE (0) Charly Frey
  
• RE: Hundreds Get Radiation Pills (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Heat comment (Q: Which ear do you us (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Position Opening (0) Leah V Hoy
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence [was GAO Opens (1) RuthWeiner
  
• GAO and DB (1) willim01
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: No link between mobile phones and tu (0) Dov Brickner
  
• RE: Pursuit of Excellence [was GAO Opens (0) Jack_Earley
  
• regulations (1) Roger Fenner
  
• Looking for EPA reference (0) Henry Wood
  
• Re: GAO and DB (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Pursuit of Excellence (0) OFFTOWY
  
• RE: regulations (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation] (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: regulations (0) Sandy Perle
  
• An HP Position is Open in Texas (0) Robert Free
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence [was GAO Opens (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements (0) hflong
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (correcti (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Hundreds Get Radiation Pills (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence [was GAO Opens (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: GAO Opens DB Investigation (correcti (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements (1) Tony Harrison
  
• Responses to questionnaires (mobile phon (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: Hundreds Get Radiation Pills (1) Carol S. Marcus
  
• Re: Hundreds Get Radiation Pills (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Re: Responses to questionnaires (mobile (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Hundreds Get Radiation Pills (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements (1) John Johnson
  
• Radon Dose and (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Heat comment (Q: Which ear do you us (0) Peter Aryasov
  
• New York Positions - 1 Year Duration (0) Stephanie Long
  
• WIPP (0) Bill.Teer
  
• Phantom Crashes into Concrete Bunker (0) Peter Woods
  
• ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (1) Todd Brautigam
  
• RE: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: variations in background (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (1) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Enc: ALARA NEWSLETTER (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Leaving NECNP (0) NECNP
  
• RE: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (0) Todd Brautigam
  
• Re: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (1) maury
  
• Radon Tests on Animals-Smoking Beagles (0) Matthew Rumick
  
• Re: Subject: Re: Pursuit of Excellence [ (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• RE: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (1) Jack_Earley
  
• Health Physicist job at University of So (0) Weaver, Adam
  
• AW: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: ABC Tests U.S. Border Security (0) maury
  
• Pursuit of Excellence (1) OFFTOWY
  
• Re: Mobile phones - which ear? (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Pursuit of Excellence (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Comments on Franz' "nail bombs" (0) Gray, William
  
• Initial Screening for NORM (0) Michael Malaxos
  
• Request for paper/comments (0) Muckerheide
  
• Another request for paper/comments (0) Muckerheide
  
• RE: Comments on Franz' "nail bombs" (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (1) William Prestwich
  
• DB liner thinner than first thought - an (1) Norman Cohen
  
• ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMUM IN (3) Quintino De Notariis
  
• HP job correct deadline date (0) Weaver, Adam
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Pursuit of Excellence (0) OFFTOWY
  
• VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (0) Johansen, Kjell
  
• Re: DB liner thinner than first thought (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMU (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMU (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• AW: ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMU (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMU (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Mirror Sources (0) Cehn
  
• RE: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (3) JGinniver
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (0) William Prestwich
  
• Should local communities be required to (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: DB liner thinner than first thought (0) Tim
  
• Re: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: Should local communities be required (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Detained Ship Ordered Back to Sea (0) Susan McElrath
  
• Case-control study weakness (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMU (0) Quintino De Notariis
  
• More from ABC news... (0) Danny K. McClung
  
• nuke guards undertrained; overworked (2) Norman Cohen
  
• Pursuit of Excellence (2) OFFTOWY
  
• Re: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Job Announcement - Auburn University (0) Charles Ray
  
• Re: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (1) Neil, David M
  
• Flotilla sails to protest UK nuclear fue (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (1) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Re: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (1) willim01
  
• Tend rate? (0) Bill_Beckett
  
• RE: Detained Ship Ordered Back to Sea: u (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (0) William Prestwich
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: ANNUAL DOSE, DOSERATE and the MAXIMU (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Standards for Consequence Assessment Cal (2) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• AW: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (0) OFFTOWY
  
• ENGINEER JOB OPENING - Miamisburg, OH (0) Bev Heatherly
  
• Re: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RE: Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• RE: Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• Re: Standards for Consequence Assessment (0) David Matchick
  
• This just in (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Ed Calabrese and Linda Baldwin again (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: British radiologists (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Pursuit of Excellence (0) RuthWeiner
  
• FW: What makes an 'expert' and expert? (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Weldon Springs (0) Marty.Bourquin
  
• Re: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (1) JGinniver
  
• EU to seek common safety rules for nucle (0) Sandy Perle
  
• TFP update article, E Magazine (4) Norman Cohen
  
• "Overmatching" Controls?! (Radon Medicin (0) hflong
  
• Standards for Errors of Omission of Horm (0) hflong
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: "Overmatching" Controls?! (Radon Med (1) epirad
  
• Re: FW: What makes an 'expert' and exper (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Norman Cohen
  
• No Subject (2) Somerville, Mark
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) BobCherry
  
• Pu-238 (0) Rosita Cope
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Somerville, Mark
  
• RE: Pu-238 -- and alpha-recoil spallatio (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: (0) tristan
  
• position available (0) Ross, Randy N HLTH:EX
  
• Re: Ship detained for radiation (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Questionnaires, phone ear, electrosoensi (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• AW: hot new jeans (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: hot new jeans (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: hot new jeans (0) Stewart Farber
  
• "Overmatching" is an Oxymoron. DBPC May (0) hflong
  
• Infectious Causes of Malignancy - A Revi (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: "Overmatching" is an Oxymoron. DBPC (0) epirad
  
• Re: "Overmatching" is an Oxymoron. DBPC (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: hot new jeans (0) maury
  
• Re: hot new jeans (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: VARIATIONS IN BACKGROUND (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• "Radiation free zones" etc (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (2) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• November 2002 (0) BABusby
  
• Re: (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Charlie Migliore
  
• Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• RE: hot new jeans (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (1) RuthWeiner
  
• [Fwd: What's New for Sep 13, 2002] (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (2) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Dave Derenzo
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (1) Kolb, William (WKOLB)
  
• Re: Ship detained for radiation (2) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Ship detained for radiation (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• Re: Ship detained for radiation (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs" (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Medical Physics Opportunity (0) Ben Vossler
  
• Article - UFO's responsible for Chernoby (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• AW: RE: hot new jeans (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Ship detained for radiation (0) tristan
  
• AW: "Radiation free zones" etc (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: "Radiation free zones" etc (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: AW: "Radiation free zones" etc/Paran (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (1) Thompson, Donald L.
  
• Re: AW: "Radiation free zones" etc/Paran (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (2) Vincent A King
  
• Re: Ship detained for radiation (0) Vincent A King
  
• RE: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (0) Vincent A King
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (1) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: AW: "Radiation free zones" etc/Paran (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (2) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Ship detained for radiation (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: AW: "Radiation free zones" etc/Paran (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (1) Muckerheide
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: AW: RE: hot new jeans (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (2) Richard L. Hess
  
• Turkey Point OPerational dates (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Electronic Dosimeters (2) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Electronic Dosimeters (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Electronic Dosimeters (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: nuke guards undertrained; overworked (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (2) William V Lipton
  
• RE: AW: "Radiation free zones" etc/Paran (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Environmental Dosimeter Intercomparisons (0) Rob Gunter
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• FW: [cdn-nucl-l] Pro Indian Point Rally (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• PWR, BWR refueling costs (0) McCulley, Joseph
  
• Re: Electronic Dosimeters (0) JGinniver
  
• Synchrotron radiation - occupancy (0) Lorraine Marceau-Day
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) john grant
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Thompson, Donald L.
  
• Tom Leher - Elements Animation (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (0) Chilton, Milton W.
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (2) William V Lipton
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine, Cons (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• equipment, sources, and shielding donati (1) KJ Kearfott
  
• RE: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Jack_Earley
  
• on-topic (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• NEI Letter to Editor (NYTimes) re: Nucl (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine; repl (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (1) Marty.Bourquin
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• RE: Environmental Dosimeter Intercompari (0) Michel, Lee S
  
• Re: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Job Posting (0) Stephanie Long
  
• 4th Annual Hanford ALARA Workshop (0) Hoyt, Joel R
  
• "Perception is reality" (3) RuthWeiner
  
• ORGANIZATIONS THAT USE RADIOACTIVE MATER (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: equipment, sources, and shielding do (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (2) maury
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (0) Randall_F_Brich
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: [rad-sci-l] Educating the Educators (0) hflong
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) Sandy Perle
  
• FW: "Perception is reality" (0) desegnac
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (1) Muckerheide
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (2) Muckerheide
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: ORGANIZATIONS THAT USE RADIOACTIVE M (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: TFP update article, E Magazine (0) maury
  
• Looking for a decent BEIR pdf archive (0) tristan
  
• No Subject (0) Petya G. Kovacheva
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) Muckerheide
  
• Re: DOE Secretary addresses "Dirty Bombs (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: ORGANIZATIONS THAT USE RADIOACTIVE M (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• GE and the scandal in Japan... (0) Charly Frey
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (was DOE Sec (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Review finds no causal assoc. between mo (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RESRAD Training Course (0) Yu, Charley
  
• Congression competence. (1) Don Jordan
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• Trainings veterinarians (0) John Pickering
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (0) Vincent A King
  
• RE: Congression competence. (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Liquid Scintillation Counter (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• RE: Congression competence. (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (was DOE Sec (1) Conklin, Al
  
• NRC Regulatory Guide 1.145 (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (was DOE Sec (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (was DOE Sec (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Decommissioning (0) Larry Boing
  
• Iran to build more nuke power plants-ato (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Congression competence. (0) Muckerheide
  
• Re: Congression competence. (1) NSSIHOU
  
• FYI: Why Does Bush Go "Nucular"? (MSN) (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) BLHamrick
  
• Radon-Stirring the Pot (1) Estabrooks, Bates (IHK)
  
• Publix supermarket to sell irradiated be (0) Fritz Strydom
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• An important Radsafe issue. (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Congression competence. (0) William V Lipton
  
• " DAVIS-BESSE SET TO RESTART DEC. 4 " (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Publix supermarket to sell irradiate (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: Why Does Bush Go "Nucular"? (MSN) (0) John Johnson
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: "Perception is reality" (was DOE Sec (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• RE: Why Does Bush Go "Nucular"? (MSN) (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (3) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (1) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Publix supermarket to sell irradiate (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• DB NRC meeting slides (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Tony Harrison
  
• more Davis Besse problems; and Db looks (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Radioactive vinegar bottle Analysis res (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• Re: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (2) epirad
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) epirad
  
• FW: Radioactive vinegar bottle Analysis (0) desegnac
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) Vincent A King
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Looking for a Book (0) Taylor, Douglas B
  
• RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (1) epirad
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) epirad
  
• Re: Looking for a book (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Japan shuts down Nuke (0) M Nivas
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Japan shuts down Nuke (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• More on "Perception is reality" (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) Philippe Duport
  
• RE: More on "Perception is reality" (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Default Surface Contamination Criteria f (0) Dan Hoffman
  
• RE: More on "Perception is reality" (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• No Subject (0) John D Simpson
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) epirad
  
• RE: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)
  
• Japanese lack of trust (0) Bolling, Jason E
  
• Re: More on "Perception is reality" (0) epirad
  
• Nuclear experts doubt terror risk (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: More on "Perception is reality" (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Homeland Security (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• AJC Article: Nuclear plants can withstan (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Eberline Working Level Monitor (0) J. Marshall Reber
  
• NCHPS meeting (0) Vaclav Vylet
  
• Re: Default Surface Contamination Criter (0) Boby Abu-Eid
  
• Re: More on "Perception is reality" (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• GM Scaler Help (0) Michael Kay
  
• NCI on NPPs as Terrorist Targets (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Perception of Risk (0) Bill.Teer
  
• Different Spins on Science Article (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: "Perception is reality" (0) BLHamrick
  
• TRU vs LLW classification (1) tristan
  
• Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror risk (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror ris (0) tristan
  
• Re: Nuclear experts doubt terror risk (0) maury
  
• Alpha dosimetry on lung epithelium (0) LAM HOI CHING
  
• Re: TRU vs LLW classification (0) Ralph E. Wild
  
• Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror risk (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror ris (0) Ted de Castro
  
• [Fwd: [Fwd: NCI on NPPs as Terrorist Tar (0) maury
  
• AW: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Radon-Stirring the Pot (0) hflong
  
• Fw: Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror ris (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: AJC Article: Nuclear plants can with (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Capability of Eberline PM-7 Portal Monit (0) WOLODARSKY W H -NUCLEAR
  
• Re: TRU vs LLW classification (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror ris (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: TRU vs LLW classification (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Fw: Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: AJC Article: Nuclear plants can with (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: TRU vs LLW classification (0) Charlie Migliore
  
• Re: Fw: Fw: Nuclear experts doubt terror (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: AJC Article: Nuclear plants can with (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• regulatory purpose vs. WILL kill (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Hiring SR HPTs for New York - Per Diem (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Re: regulatory purpose vs. WILL kill (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: AJC Article: Nuclear plants can with (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: AJC Article: Nuclear plants can with (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: NCI on NPPs as Terrorist Targets (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• D&D in Calif. (0) Cehn
  
• Re: D&D in Calif. (0) BLHamrick
  
• Mobile phone article in WSJ (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: regulatory purpose vs. WILL kill (1) Ted de Castro
  
• HP Vacancy at NIST (0) Timothy Mengers
  
• Re: NCI on NPPs as Terrorist Targets (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Save the FFTF (1) RuthWeiner
  
• more on the messie at Davis Besse (0) Norman Cohen
  
• U ore dust and yellowcake (0) Grant Cubbon
  
• AW: regulatory purpose vs. WILL kill (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: regulatory purpose vs. WILL kill (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Martin D. Kamen remembrance (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: Martin D. Kamen remembrance (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Poland Radiotherapy Accident (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• ICRP 88 Correction (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• Kr85 Source Question (1) Gregory R. Larson
  
• Training in Game Show Format (0) NORTH, Ralph
  
• Non-Sequitur (0) Tosh Ushino, CHP
  
• RE: Kr85 Source Question (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Norland 5000 Multi Channel Analyzer (0) rurban@jason.com
  
• Re: Kr85 Source Question (0) willim01
  
• Kr-85 Source (0) willim01
  
• RE: Kr85 Source Question (0) Perrero, Daren
  
• Position at NYS Health Dept. (0) Cynthia A. Costello
  
• No Subject (0) TConley
  
• Gamma constant for Am-241 (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Gamma constant for Am-241 (0) Perrero, Daren
  
• SR RCTs Needed for Los Alamos (0) Stephanie Long
  
• The FFTF (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Transport of a Self-Contained Irradiator (0) Wesley
  
• RE: The FFTF (0) Conklin, Al
  
• interview with Dr. Joseph MacInnis, Auth (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Transport of a Self-Contained Irradi (0) RuthWeiner
  
• rad monitor setpoints (0) JOHN.RICH
  
• RE: Transport of a Self-Contained Irradi (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Check Source Identification (2) Christopher Blasio
  
• Recycling depleted uranium (0) Tom Morgan
  
• SR Deconners Needed Immediately (0) Stephanie Long
  
• cosmic rays (1) Peter Sandgren
  
• AW: Check Source Identification (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Transport of a Self-Contained Irradi (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Tragedy in Fla (0) Roger Fenner
  
• Tragedy (0) Roger Fenner
  
• RE: The FFTF (0) Randall_F_Brich
  
• RE: Transport of a Self-Contained Irradi (0) alstonchris
  
• INTERNATIONAL ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY COMPARI (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: Recycling depleted uranium (0) alstonchris
  
• RE: cosmic rays (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: Transport of a Self-Contained Irradi (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: Recycling depleted uranium (0) NSSIHOU
  
• Re: Transport of a Self-Contained Irradi (0) NSSIHOU
  
• Re: Tragedy in Fla - AP articles (0) Julie_F_Shafer
  
• Deep Earth reactor -- internet broadcast (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: cosmic rays (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• IAEA Technical Documents (TECDOCs) (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• INTERNATIONAL ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY COMPARI (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• IAEA Technical Documents (TECDOCs) (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Internet article re: Airplanes over SONG (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Health Physics Society Meeting On "Radio (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Internet article re: Airplanes over (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Tragedy in Fla - AP articles (0) Hart, Tim P GS (RASO)
  
• Re: Health Physics Society Meeting On "R (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: cosmic rays (1) john grant
  
• RE: cosmic rays (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• RE: Health Physics Society Meeting On "R (0) desegnac
  
• The United States Healthcare Directory (0) Barbara Caldwell
  
• "Science" Sept 20 "Policy Forum" on "Nuc (0) Muckerheide
  
• AW: Check Source Identification (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Blue light emission from certain envelop (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Blue light emission from certain env (0) desegnac
  
• RE: Blue light emission from certain env (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• re:tragedy in Fla (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Turkish police say seized uranium weighs (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Blue light emission from certain env (0) desegnac
  
• RE: The Informed Patient: The Battle Aga (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Blue light emission from certain env (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• AW: The Informed Patient: The Battle Aga (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: The Informed Patient: The Battle Aga (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: cosmic rays (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• K-19, The Widowmaker (0) maury
  
• RE: cosmic rays (0) Jack_Earley
  
• 1988 warning ignored at the Besse-Messie (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: cosmic rays (2) john grant
  
• Re: cosmic rays (1) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: cosmic rays (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Re: cosmic rays (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Mobile phones and brain cancer (1) John Moulder
  
• New book: "Tritium on Ice" (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Taxpayers to Owe Billions for Nuclear Wa (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: New book: "Tritium on Ice" (1) Ralph E. Wild
  
• MSDS (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• Re: Mobile phones and brain cancer (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: MSDS (0) Tom Morgan
  
• RE: MSDS (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• RE: MSDS (0) Jack_Earley
  
• RE: MSDS (0) Hart, Tim P GS (RASO)
  
• Re: New book: "Tritium on Ice" (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Cell Phone-Tumor Lawsuit Is Tossed (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: MSDS (0) jfnicolosi@tds.net
  
• RE: MSDS (0) Jack_Earley
  
• Re: MSDS (0) Eric Cowdrey
  
• Re: "Tritium on Ice" (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Governor Gray Davis has vetoed SB 1970 (1) maury
  
• RE: "Tritium on Ice" (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Governor Gray Davis has vetoed SB 19 (0) lavelyp
  
• Re: Governor Gray Davis has vetoed SB 19 (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: MSDS (0) NSSIHOU
  
• Re: Governor Gray Davis has vetoed SB 19 (0) maury
  
• Re: Governor Gray Davis has vetoed SB 19 (0) BLHamrick