Re: Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements

["John Johnson" <idias@interchange.ubc.ca>]

Tony et al



I agree. Glass based measurement or not as good as continuous air

monitoring, but the are better than a single "real time" air sample.



John

________________

John R Johnson, Ph D

4535 West 9th Ave.

Vancouver, B. C.

V6R 2E2

(604) 222-9840

idias@interchange.ubc.ca





Subject: Re: Fw: Glass-Based Radon Measurements





> The point of the paper, however, was not lung cancer risks, but that

> glass based measurements provide a better basis for long term dose

> assessment than air samples, a claim that has been made in other papers.

>  I think the jury is still out on that one, and we can honestly say that

> it needs further investigation.





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/