[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?!



0.05% by weight is the limit for licensing of source material.  Below 

that it is essentially exempt from regulatory oversight.  Greater than 

that and it qualifies as source material and would require a 

radioactive materials license unless it met one of the specific 

exemptions in 10CFR40.13(c).

 

Marty Bourquin

 

Marty.Bourquin@Grace.com



-----Original Message-----

From: liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM [mailto:liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM]

Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:39 AM

To: DLT@CDRH.FDA.GOV

Cc: Bob.Westerdale@ametek.com; WKOLB@arinc.com; 

radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?!







NCRP Report No. 95, "Radition Exposure of the U.S. Population From 

Consumer Products and Miscellaneous Sources," states, in paragraph 

3.2.7.4, "Dental Products":  "Porcelain teeth and crowns are composed 

principally of feldspar minerals that contain cmall quantities (0.001 

percent) of naturally occurring K-40.  The practice of adding uranium 

salts was initiated at least half a century ago when it was discovered 

that small amounts of the element contributed a natural color and 

fluorescence to dentures...Under regulations of the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, neither domestic nor imported teeth and powders 

may contain in excess of 0.05 percent by weight of uranium..." 



I can't find this requirement in the regulations.  Does anyone know 

where it is? 



The opinions expressed are strictly mine. 

It's not about dose, it's about trust. 

Curies forever. 



Bill Lipton 

liptonw@dteenergy.com 



"Thompson, Donald L." wrote: 



 In regard to dental porcelain, FDA's Bureau of Radiological Health 

published a report on the topic in 1976 which lead to an industry 

standard on uranium limits and later to substitutes for uranium.  Let 

me know if you want a copy as I have one or two left. 



-----Original Message----- 

From: Bob Westerdale [ mailto:Bob.Westerdale@ametek.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 1:34 PM 

To: Kolb, William (WKOLB) 

Cc: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu 

Subject: RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! 

 





Bill- 

        Thanks for the insight-   The glass does seem to have an 

uncommon "opalescence" to it,    I'll dig up a UV lamp and see what 

glows...     As an aside,  I remember reading somewhere that long ago 

dentures were made with a bit of Uranium (?) to enhance the natural 

appearance and glow ( perhaps the wrong term!) of the teeth.   Doses to 

the users were said to be pretty high!    Has anyone come across this?  

 I inquired with a few local Dentistry associations,  but received no 

valid responses. 

        Thanks!!! 

                Bob Westerdale 

  

  



	"Kolb, William (WKOLB)" <WKOLB@arinc.com> 



09/16/02 12:36 PM





        To:        "'Bob Westerdale'" <Bob.Westerdale@ametek.com>, 

radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu 

        cc:  

        Subject:        RE: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?!	



  



Bob, 



Ivory glass or Custard glass was made with uranium oxide in amounts 

ranging 

from 0.1 to 10 percent to obtain an opalescent to opaque white glass 

beginning in the mid 1880s. One way to test for the deliberate presence 

of 

uranium rather than tramp contaminants is to expose the glass to UV 

light. 

It will glow a bright yellow green under both long and shortwave UV. 



bill 

ARINC 



-----Original Message----- 

From: Bob Westerdale [ mailto:Bob.Westerdale@ametek.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:48 AM 

To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu 

Subject: Radioactive vinegar bottle ?!?! 

  

  



Greetings Radsafers, 

       While clearing up some old broken glass I uncovered an unusual 

white-glass souvenir bottle from the 1939 World's Fair,  which I have 

come 

to find out was originally filled with vinegar and sold by the A&P  

company 

( foodstore). 

Just by chance I happened to wave a survey meter at this bottle, and to 

my 

surprise it was slightly  radioactive- approximately .2 mR/hr with a 

Victoreen Ion Chamber.    I'd assume this manufactured this way 

intentionally  ( maybe?)-- any idea why?    Glazing?  ( ala  Fiesta 

ware?) 

I tried to take a spectrum ( EDS from about 3 keV to about 20 keV) but 

couldn't see anything.  Maybe a beta emmitter? 

A couple sheets of paper don't seem to stop it, so I suspect no alphas 

are 

present. 



I found one  pictured on EBay ( of course) for anyone who might be 

curious. 

( no, it's not mine!) 



Thanks, 

       Bob Westerdale 

       RSO,  EDAX Inc. 

  

  

  

  



http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=713600431 

  

  

 









************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/