[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another question re: dose
Hi All,
Several comments.
It's Sieverts, not Seiverts, and Grays not Greys.
But above all, something must be wrong when an equation dictates the use
of units!! Orwellian indeed!
Or, maybe - oh god forbid - it's the LNT and its use that are wrong!
:-))
Have a nice weekend,
Fritz
************************
Fritz A. Seiler, Ph. D.
President
Sigma Five Consulting
P.O. Box 1709
Los Lunas, NM 87031, USA
Tel. 505-866-5193
Fax. 505-866-5197
e-mail: faseiler@nmia.com
***********************
Ted de Castro wrote:
>
> John Johnson wrote:
>
> > FYI, doses can be in Grey (absorbed dose in energy per unit mass) or two
> > kinds of Seiverts (1. equivalent dose in Greys x a radiation weighting
> > factor Wsub(R) or 2. effective dose (Esub(eff)) in Greys x a radiation
> > weighting factor Wsub(R) x a tissue weighting factor Wsub(T) ). The
> > effective dose is an attempt to calculate a quantity that is proportional to
> > the risk.
> >
> > A whole body Esub(eff) of 10 mSv/year has a much higher risk than the same
> > Esub(eff) to a smaller tissue.
>
> IF and ONLY IF LNTH is true! This is a problem with SI units - they are
> defined in terms of LNTH, making it hard to discuss otherwise without
> them.
>
> So very Orwellian!
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/