[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TRU vs LLW classification



For non-defense waste, it is also necessary to consider the disposal facility limits.

The Barnwell license does not permit the acceptance of waste where the TRU is greater than 1% of the total activity.

The Envirocare license is radionuclide specific.  The limit for Pu-239 is 10 nCi/g.

From the generator's point of view, anything not acceptable at a low level waste disposal facility is not low level waste.

The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.

Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com

RuthWeiner@AOL.COM wrote:

TRU waste is defined as waste that contains more than 100 nCi/gram of elements heavier than uranium.  However, according to the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, only "defense-generated" waste can go to the WIPP for disposal.  So non-defense waste that meets the TRU definition wouldn't be accepted for disposal at the WIPP.  Actually  the EBR-II waste falls into this category of TRU waste that is not defense-generated.

A great deal of TRU waste could be categorized as LLW Class C (or A or B).  In fact, about 10% of the identified TRU waste meets the criteria for LSA.

Ruth

Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com