[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: TRU vs LLW classification



<<The Envirocare license is radionuclide specific.  The limit for Pu-239 is 10 nCi/g.

 

Yes, generally any concentration up to limits of class A as defined by 10CFR 60.55. Of course Pu is SNM and has mass limits.

 

Plus liquid and mixed wastes:

 http://www.envirocareutah.com/pages/lp/RML_UT2300249_AMD_14.pdf

 

 

Charlie Migliore

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu [mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of William V Lipton
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:44 AM
To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Cc: tristan@blackhat.net; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: TRU vs LLW classification

 

For non-defense waste, it is also necessary to consider the disposal facility limits.

The Barnwell license does not permit the acceptance of waste where the TRU is greater than 1% of the total activity.

The Envirocare license is radionuclide specific.  The limit for Pu-239 is 10 nCi/g.

From the generator's point of view, anything not acceptable at a low level waste disposal facility is not low level waste.

The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.

Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com

RuthWeiner@AOL.COM wrote:

TRU waste is defined as waste that contains more than 100 nCi/gram of elements heavier than uranium.  However, according to the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, only "defense-generated" waste can go to the WIPP for disposal.  So non-defense waste that meets the TRU definition wouldn't be accepted for disposal at the WIPP.  Actually  the EBR-II waste falls into this category of TRU waste that is not defense-generated.

A great deal of TRU waste could be categorized as LLW Class C (or A or B).  In fact, about 10% of the identified TRU waste meets the criteria for LSA.

Ruth

Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com