Should local communities be required to provide "radiation free zones"?

["Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@HOTMAIL.COM>]

The site below is about problems related to health damage due to oral 

galvanism, hypersensitivity to electricity etc. The quiz to the right - at 

the bottom may be of some interest - a translation would be something like:



Bold text:

"Should (//radiation//) freezones be created for those that are 

hypersensitive to electricity."

(It is a question but they forgot the question mark)



The rest of the text: "Shall the communes (=municipalities - like smaller 

U.S. counties) be required to provide a freezone for those who claim that 

they get sick when new masts are constructed?"



Ja=Yes  (165 at this moment of writing)

Nej=No  (22 at this moment of writing)



http://www.kvicksilver.org/

(kvicksilver = Swedish word for mercury)



You may say that this is unimportant to non-Swedes - I say "not unimportant" 

because there is so much global crosstalk today. What they come up with here 

may come to other countries later on so it is good if a large part of the 

population gets an opportunity to answer.



I am sure that the high level of radiation expertise among Radsafers can add 

to the value of the site (sorry that most of you can't read the Swedish).



My personal initiative only,



Bjorn Cedervall    bcradsafers@hotmail.com





_________________________________________________________________

Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 

http://www.hotmail.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/