[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Tritium on Ice"
I am curious to know if anyone knows or can conceive of a plausible
situation where release of tritium to the environment could result in a
significant radiological public health problem (excluding problems of mental
health, regulatory compliance, or anything related to perceived risk).
----- Original Message -----
From: Ralph E. Wild <rewild@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
To: Norman Cohen <ncohen12@comcast.net>
Cc: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>; <Know_Nukes@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: New book: "Tritium on Ice"
> >
> >
> >> Thus, the alleged consensus amounted basically to an opinion by a
single person.
> >>
> Sorta overlooks the EIS on construction of new tritium production
> reactor(s) by DOE, the EIS on accelerator production of triutim, ant the
> EIS on use of civilian reactors for tritium production. I doubt that
> this one person wrote all of these three environmental impact statements
> or that she retrieved all of the copies from all of the public reading
> rooms.
>
> Ralph E. Wild
> URS Corporation
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/