[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Tritium on Ice"



I am curious to know if anyone knows  or can conceive of a plausible

situation where release of tritium to the environment could result in a

significant radiological public health problem (excluding problems of mental

health, regulatory compliance, or anything related to perceived risk).







----- Original Message -----

From: Ralph E. Wild <rewild@ATTGLOBAL.NET>

To: Norman Cohen <ncohen12@comcast.net>

Cc: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>; <Know_Nukes@yahoogroups.com>

Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:07 PM

Subject: Re: New book: "Tritium on Ice"





> >

> >

> >>  Thus, the alleged consensus amounted basically to an opinion by a

single person.

> >>

> Sorta overlooks the EIS on construction of new tritium production

> reactor(s) by DOE, the EIS on accelerator production of triutim, ant the

> EIS on use of civilian reactors for tritium production.  I doubt that

> this one person wrote all of these three environmental impact statements

> or that she retrieved all of the copies from all of the public reading

> rooms.

>

> Ralph E. Wild

> URS Corporation

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/