Re: Re :LNT and educating the public[Scanned]

[Muckerheide <muckerheide@attbi.com>]

on 11/1/02 10:31 AM, William V Lipton at liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM wrote:



> Maybe DOE should publish a regulation not allowing gravity to exist.  That

> would solve a lot of problems.



Nothing new, Bill.  ICRP/NCRP et al. have already done it, repeatedly!



And DOE even claimed workers were injured by radiation!?



Regards, Jim





 

> The opinions expressed are strictly mine.

> It's not about dose, it's about trust. ("Trust me, it's not radioactive.")

> Curies forever.

> 

> Bill Lipton

> liptonw@dteenergy.com

> 

> Michael McNaughton wrote:

> 

>> At 06:32 AM 11/01/2002 -0500, William V Lipton wrote:

>>> It was definitely a religious belief at the DOE facility where I worked

>>> that natural or depleted uranium is not radioactive.

>> 

>> My memory tells me DU was defined as non-radioactive by the earlier DOE

>> regulations.

>> 

>> Mike McNaughton

>> Los Alamos National Lab.

>> email: mcnaught@LANL.gov or mcnaughton@LANL.gov

>> phone: 505-667-6130

> 

> 

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/