Re: So, you think you have problems with radioactive sources?

[Muckerheide <muckerheide@attbi.com>]

on 11/11/02 7:51 PM, BLHamrick@AOL.COM at BLHamrick@AOL.COM wrote:



> In a message dated 11/11/2002 4:23:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,

> lists@richardhess.com writes:

> 

>> Actually, a careful reading of the above is that the losses are based on

>> people's fears, not the actual effects of the radiation. Interesting.

>> Irresponsible?

>> 

>> Comments?



<snip> 

> We may, literally, have a billion dollar clean-up effort, based on a

> regulatory limit, but with no legitimate health and safety concern.

> That makes no sense.

> 

> Barbara



Hi Barbara,



Of course it does. Where's the $ billion? Follow the money!



As Ted Rockwell says, "The money doesn't go down some rat hole, it goes into

some rat's pocket." :-)



Thanks.

Regards, Jim

============

"It's about dose; its about truth about dose effects!

All else is semantics."



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/