[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: nuclear fuel fire consequences
What a wonderful reason for the US to reprocess spent nuclear fuel (or at
very least, dispose of it at a more permanent facility) rather than having
utilities store it on-site--in a way, it seems kinda odd coming from the
anti-nuclear community--statements like this (which I realize are actually
aimed at exaggerating and magnifying potential NPP safety concerns) could
actually be used to promote technically sound radioactive waste management
efforts. Thanks!
Greg Gibbons
-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Cohen [mailto:ncohen12@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:33 AM
To: UNPLUG Salem Campaign; JerseyShoreNuclearWatch@yahoogroups.com;
Know_Nukes@yahoogroups.com; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: nuclear fuel fire consequences
Raymond Shadis wrote:
> FYI- I'm reserving comment pending a look at the referenced study but it
appears to revive 1960's meltdown consequence estimates in the report
Wash-740 and the Brookhaven (National Lab) studies that estimated an area
the size of Pennsylvania might have to abandoned. In an NRC Comission
Briefing on the Staff Technical Study on Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk,
Commissioner Diaz asked me if I thought the risk of a spent fuel pool fire
was greater than that of a reactor meltdown. Ironical. ain't it?
>
> Ray
> Raymond Shadis
> Staff Advisor
> New England Coalition
> 207-882-7801
>
> NRC study warns of 500-mile radiation spread
>
> By ROGER WITHERSPOON
> THE JOURNAL NEWS
> (Original publication: November 10, 2002)
>
> A catastrophic meltdown in the spent fuel pool of a nuclear power plant
could cause fatal, radiation-induced cancer in thousands of people as far as
500 miles from the site, according to a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
study.
>
> The analysis of spent fuel pool meltdowns also states that millions of
people within such a 500-mile zone might have to be evacuated for periods
ranging from 30 days to one year and that people living within 10 miles of a
nuclear plant, such as Indian Point in Buchanan, might never be able to
return to their homes.
>
> It also cites the potential for "prompt fatalities" from radiation
poisoning that would occur in areas close to a plant site, where many
radioactive particles would be expected to fall.
>
> The extent of possible radiation damage described in the NRC documents is
far more severe than anything that federal, Westchester County or Indian
Point officials have disclosed in public forums or written statements mailed
to thousands of residents in Westchester, Rockland, Putnam and Orange
counties.
>
> The agency's assessments are contained in a special report prepared by
experts within the NRC and the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque,
N.M., in October 2000 that was designated as an official NRC planning
regulation in February 2001. A copy of the report was obtained by The
Journal News.
>
> The study has been criticized by nuclear industry representatives who say
it reflects a worst-case scenario based on unrealistic assumptions and
ignores the effectiveness of plant safety systems.
>
> Michael Slobodien, director of emergency programs at the site for Entergy
Nuclear Northeast, which owns Indian Point 2 and 3, said even if an accident
did occur at Indian Point's spent fuel pool, the facility had the ability to
control the situation and prevent the release of radiation into the
atmosphere.
>
> "This is a generic report and is not applicable to Indian Point,"
Slobodien said. "It neglects the Indian Point design features, and I cannot
accept the premise of a meltdown and fire in the spent fuel pool when it
comes to Indian Point. You cannot set up a case where it can happen at
Indian Point."
>
> Sandia laboratories maintain a computer simulation system that enables the
NRC to predict the possible spread of radiation from any of the nation's 103
nuclear plants based on their location, geography and area population
densities and the prevailing or seasonal weather patterns within hundreds of
miles of the sites. Damage assessments - including the number of prompt
fatalities, long-term cancers, affected population centers and durations of
evacuations for specific areas - can then be estimated for any region of the
country. Within 500 miles of Indian Point, there are nearly 82 million
people living in the United States and 11 million in Canada.
>
> The report provides the basis for any future NRC regulations on evacuation
needs, safety requirements and insurance and compares the possible damage
caused by a spent fuel pool meltdown with that of a meltdown in a fully
operational nuclear reactor. It was developed to show the NRC what types of
problems could occur in spent fuel pools when nuclear plants are shut down,
at which point no new fuel rods would be placed in the pools, and how long
they might pose a danger from a meltdown and fire.
>
> The potential spread of contamination cited in the report far exceeds the
10-mile zone the nation's nuclear plants currently utilize in developing
emergency evacuation plans. NRC and Indian Point officials said the
evacuation plans are intended to deal only with short-term radiation
poisoning, which is not likely to occur outside the 10-mile zone.
>
> The report was pulled from the NRC's public database following the Sept.
11, 2001, terrorist attacks because, agency spokesman Neil Sheehan said, "if
a terrorist decided to attack any plant in the U.S., not just Indian Point,
that is information about what fatalities it could cause, and the exact
knowledge of that could be very advantageous to them."
>
> The information was returned to the database in April, however, because it
is an official regulation governing spent fuel pool operations and must be
accessible to plant operators.
>
> The report states that analysts did not base their findings on "events due
to sabotage. No established method exists for estimating the likelihood of a
sabotage event. Nor is there a method for analyzing the effect of security
provisions on that likelihood." Instead, analysts examined various accident
scenarios, ranging from worker mishaps to plane crashes into a spent fuel
pool building. The report concluded that while the probability of such
accidents is extremely low, the impact of a meltdown would be enormous.
>
> The protection and disposition of spent fuel is a national problem. Every
two years, plants such as Indian Point replace a third of the nearly 100
tons of fuel used in their reactors with new fuel. The spent fuel at Indian
Point 2 and 3 is stored in pools of water 40 feet deep, and both are nearing
their storage limit. The federal government is developing a permanent
repository for spent fuel under Yucca Mountain in Nevada, which is expected
to open around 2010.
>
> The uranium fuel used in reactors has a zirconium coating that permits
nuclear reactions to occur but helps prevent the fuel from literally burning
up and being dispersed into the atmosphere. The cooling water in the reactor
and the spent fuel pools keep the temperature low enough that there is no
danger of fire.
>
> The internal heat of the nuclear fuel drops over time, and after about
five years spent fuel rods can be removed from the pools and stored in dry
casks that are air cooled. It had been thought by plant operators that there
was little chance of a zirconium fire in fuel that was out of a reactor for
at least five years. As a result, nuclear plant operators were not required
to have emergency evacuation plans for events involving spent fuel pools,
even though the pools hold hundreds of tons of radioactive material, far
more than is used in the reactors. The NRC was considering industry requests
to reduce insurance requirements for pools containing only older fuel.
>
> But the report states that a zirconium fire still can occur 30 years after
fuel rods are removed from a reactor, as significant an accident as a
worst-case reactor-core meltdown, and that the danger of cancer-causing,
radioactive contamination would not significantly decrease at least for that
long.
>
> The report assesses the effects of a fuel fire that would be triggered if
water were completely or partially drained from spent fuel pools.
Cesium-137, which is among the radioactive particles that could be released
into the atmosphere, is the primary cause of long-term cancers, according to
the NRC study. In that regard, cesium-137 is more significant than
radioactive iodine. Westchester, Rockland, Putnam and Orange county
officials have distributed pills to residents living within 10 miles of
Indian Point as a possible protection against thyroid cancer induced by the
radioactive iodine.
>
> Current evacuation plans approved by the NRC for Indian Point are based on
the premise that it would take several hours or days to reach the stage
where a fuel fire would release radiation into the atmosphere. The agency's
2000 report states that a zirconium fire could erupt and begin releasing
radiation within two to four hours after water was completely or partially
drained from a spent fuel pool.
>
> Charles Tinkler, a senior adviser in the NRC's office of research and
co-author of the report's section on meltdown consequences, said the NRC
studied the effects of contamination at Chernobyl in Ukraine, which suffered
a catastrophic meltdown in 1986. There is a permanent exclusion zone
extending about 35 miles around the site of the former reactor. A permanent
exclusion zone also would be needed following such an accident at Indian
Point, Tinkler said.
>
> "I am not sure it would be comparable to the same radius as Chernobyl,"
Tinkler said in an interview. "We would predict that persons would be
excluded from that property for the duration if they live within the
10-mile, emergency-planning zone."
>
> Tom Hinton, a radiation ecologist at the University of Georgia's Savannah
River Ecology Lab, said the extent of contamination from a meltdown depends
on how high the contaminants are pushed into the atmosphere, local weather
conditions and the type of radioactive isotopes involved.
>
> "At Chernobyl," he said, "there was contamination spread around the world,
though the majority of it was within 300 kilometers or so. Contamination
depends on local weather conditions, specifically rain. If a (radiation)
cloud passes over you and it is not raining, you will not get as much
contamination as if it were raining. Rain scavenges contaminants out of the
air and deposits them locally. That is the reason for many hotspots that
occurred around Europe after the Chernobyl accident."
>
> Some radiological isotopes, such as plutonium, will stay where they land,
Hinton said, while others travel through the environment contaminating
plants and waterways.
>
> Officials in the four counties around Indian Point conducted a mock
evacuation drill of the 10-mile zone on Sept. 24 under the auspices of the
NRC and Federal Emergency Management Agency, which certifies emergency
evacuation plans.
>
> Officials at the time said radiation leaking from the reactor would
dissipate after about five miles and the evacuation plans would protect the
public from any harmful radiation.
>
> Though the drill did not entail the scope of accident studied by the NRC
and Sandia, Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano last June hosted a
briefing for about 80 municipal and school officials, where they were
assured there was little danger of contamination if a meltdown occurred in
the reactor. Herschel Specter, a consultant for Entergy, said that 90
percent of county residents were "not at radiological risk. They may be
terrified, but there is no danger."
>
> Specter said a massive release of radiation would be of short duration and
do little damage.
>
> Slobodien acknowledged last week that the emergency planning zone was
designed to protect the public from acute health effects, but that "the
latent effects of cancer can occur far beyond that."
>
> Concurring in that assessment was James Lee Witt, former director of FEMA
under President Clinton. During his tenure, Witt approved the effectiveness
of emergency plans for residents living near each of the nation's nuclear
power plants. In an interview last week, Witt said none of the plans deals
with protecting residents from long-term radiation effects from a reactor or
spent fuel pool accident.
>
> "If you are dealing with a meltdown at that level," Witt said, "you
potentially have a threat to deal with that could reach beyond the 10 miles.
I was aware of it. But our task has been to look at the emergency
preparedness in a 10-mile radius, and that is what we were looking at."
>
> Witt, now a private emergency management consultant, was given an $800,000
contract by Gov. George Pataki to examine the effectiveness of the emergency
plans for the 10 miles around Indian Point. His report is due in December.
>
> David Lochbaum, a nuclear safety analyst for the Union of Concerned
Scientists in Washington, D.C., said that the argument that radiation
couldn't go more than five miles or so "was never accurate."
>
> "If they put the correct information out there and involved the American
public and got a majority of people to agree that only those 10 miles need
to be protected, that would be one thing," he said. "But for a small group
of people to make a decision behind closed doors is what the Kremlin used to
do, isn't it?"
>
> Tinkler, who worked on the NRC report, said the study's estimates of
possible fatal cancers was based on the conservative premise that a spent
fuel pool fire would release up to nine times as much cesium-137 as the
meltdown at Chernobyl, and that any dose of radiation above the normal
background level for a region could induce cancer at some point.
>
> "It means our figures ... represent the upper bounce," Tinkler said. "But
it is not beyond the physical limits of the material involved. It provides
us an outside limit for planning."
>
> A decision on how many millions of people might have to be evacuated
following a real spent fuel pool fire, he said, would depend on the cost of
evacuation, and what is perceived to be an acceptable death rate.
>
> "The decision would depend on what level of radiation the government
decided people could receive without a significant health effect," Tinkler
said. "That means some acceptable increase in the risk of cancer."
>
> Send e-mail to Roger Witherspoon
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> The Magnum-Opus Project---The Mission: To do a greater good.
> Righting the wrongs of the Manhattan Project's deceit and treachery
national security methods using openness and accountability.
> DOE Watch List--Where toxic health damage is not a mystery.
> A news list combined with scientific studies to expose the problems.
> Subscribe: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/doewatch
> DOE Watch OR Web page: http://members.aol.com/doewatch
> Rocky Flats EIN page: http://members.aol.com/magnu96196/EINHome.html
>
> Insoluble toxic metals and fluorides, via a pneumonia like dust in lung
process, concentrate in lymph nodes and cause foreign body granuloma damage
to node macrophages, leading to false cytokine stimulation, then rising
viral waste damage to mitochondria, and this leading to illnesses. See the
analysis at http://members.aol.com/magnu96196/cfs.html
>
> In the 1980's, Oak Ridge managers established a national alliance of DOE
friendly supplanted activists and old DOE scientists to mislead gullible
fluoride affected sick workers and communities in order to fabricate a
health mystery and avoid the extreme liabilities of the fluorides health
damage to uranium gas diffusion chemical plant workers and communities.
Don't let DOE and its minions stone wall known disease processes known for
millennia and involved in religion icon imagery.
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Coalition for Peace and Justice and the UNPLUG Salem Campaign; 321 Barr
Ave., Linwood, NJ 08221; 609-601-8583 or 609-601-8537; ncohen12@comcast.net
UNPLUG SALEM WEBSITE: http://www.unplugsalem.org/ COALITION FOR PEACE AND
JUSTICE WEBSITE: http://www.coalitionforpeaceandjustice.org The Coalition
for Peace and Justice is a chapter of Peace Action.
"First they ignore you; Then they laugh at you; Then they fight you; Then
you win. (Gandhi) "Why walk when you can fly?" (Mary Chapin Carpenter)
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/