[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DU talk
>...
>completely at odds with mankind's decades of experience working with natural
>and enriched uranium, much less depleted uranium.
>...
So it is OK to use words like "depleted" to make misleading implications and
it is not when words like "nuclear", "radioactive" etc. are used for similar
purposes? Or are things really that bad in the US - like it used to be
in the USSR times - to a point where self-censorship does almost
all the job alone? I am really clueless and no, I am not after DU info.
I neither need it nor is there anything about it I would not know if
I had or wanted to.
What is startling me is the thought that there would be no US to confront
a North-American USSR... Please prove me wrong, that's really a scaring thought...
Dimiter
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff
http://transgalactic.freeyellow.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DU talk
- From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>
- Re: DU talk
- From: "Otto G. Raabe" <ograabe@UCDAVIS.EDU>