[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dirty Bombs

To: jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET, brickner@in.zahav.net.il, tedrock@CPCUG.ORG, radsafeinst@cableone.net, jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: Dirty Bombs
From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:58:53 EST
Reply-To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

In a message dated 12/22/02 1:18:10 PM Mountain Standard Time, jjcohen@prodigy.net writes:

. Can anyone please offer any scientifically based arguments to justify why the public might be better off for our continuing use of LNT?

I do not believe any such argument is possible.

Ruth
Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Dirty Bombs
Next by Date: Re: Dirty Bombs
Prev by thread: Re: Dirty bombs
Next by thread: Re: Dirty Bombs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread