[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared
Just a thought, but perhaps the RAM designation is to reflect potential
hazards for parts and pieces of the debris being irradiated by high energy
cosmic radiation. NOT A STATEMENT OF FACT just a thought
"Frey, Steven R."
<sfreyohp@SLAC.STANFOR To: "'Flood, John'" <FloodJR@NV.DOE.GOV>, RADSAFE <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
D.EDU> cc:
Sent by: Fax to:
owner-radsafe@list.van Subject: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared
derbilt.edu
02/06/2003 10:27 AM
Please respond to
"Frey, Steven R."
If NASA decided to call Columbia wreckage RAM to protect its quality as
forensic evidence knowing that it is not RAM, then that is a most
inappropriate decision and application of the spirit of radioactive
material safety regulations. Worse, the inordinate fear that much of the
public has about radioactivity can only be made worse. Not one to
second-guess NASA because of their being under duress from the accident,
but NASA and the new Homeland Security Department ought to set the record
straight with the public about Columbia 'RAM" immediately.
-----Original Message-----
From: Flood, John [mailto:FloodJR@NV.DOE.GOV]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:56 AM
To: RADSAFE
Subject: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared
I think it likely that the warnings took rad and non-rad hazards into
consideration, but may well have been mainly intended to keep people away
so the materials wouldn't be disturbed or stolen, thereby disrupting the
investigation.
-----Original Message-----
From: High Plains Drifter [mailto:magna1@jps.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:57 PM
To: Rad Safety Institute; Susan L Gawarecki; RADSAFE
Subject: Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared
Nuclear Powered Space craft feared......did anyone notice that the
warning on shuttle debris and that the military folks were monitoring
objects for radioactivity and that the truck and trailer taking items
to the air base was placarded with RAM signs! The warning about
toxics, which were volatiles, appears to be misleading and that the
real hazard was radioactivity. Can anyone shed some light on just
what was aboard the shuttle that could possibly cause 1000's of
fragments to be contaminated to such a degree!
Dean Chaney, CHP
----- Original Message -----
From: Rad Safety Institute
To: Susan L Gawarecki ; RADSAFE
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared
This is a littlle whimsical, but does anyone remember Project Orion?
Also, bet the people wringing their hands over possible accidents do
not realize how many nuclear weapons were crashed in the "good ol'
days". Ed Battle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Susan L Gawarecki" <loc@icx.net>
To: "RADSAFE" <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:22 PM
Subject: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared
> I am weary of anti-nuclear activists seizing on every accident as
an
> opportunity to say "imagine how much worse this would have been if
a
> nuclear [reactor, waste, material] had been involved." In the
meantime,
> out of irrational fears, we are losing the significant
environmental and
> efficiency benefits of applied applications of nuclear power.
>
> My own personal opinion.
>
> Susan Gawarecki