RadSafe Archive Mail Index February, 2003

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Quiz: RE(2): Power Plant was declared ba (0) Emil
  
• RE: Feedback - Radioactive iodine leak c (1) Rogers Brent
  
• Re: Dogma, anti-nukes,and the nuclear "d (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: Quiz: RE(2): Power Plant was declare (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Letter to Olean (NY) Times-Herald Editor (2) BobCherry
  
• Re: Letter to Olean (NY) Times-Herald Ed (0) Rad Safety Institute
  
• RE: Letter to Olean (NY) Times-Herald Ed (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Letter to Consumer Reports (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Feedback - Radioactive iodine leak c (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Feedback - Radioactive iodine leak c (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Workshop on Occupational Radiation Prote (0) Secretariat
  
• Nuclear Weapons use by US in IRAQ (0) Collins, Steve
  
• Dosimetry Positions (0) Dave Biela
  
• RE: Job Posting (1) Catherine Perham
  
• Re: Job Posting (1) William V Lipton
  
• Tsuruga to OK Monju reactor renovation a (0) Sandy Perle
  
• IAEA Publications on NDT (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Job Posting (1) Marthaller, Chris
  
• Re: Job Posting (2) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) john grant
  
• AW: Job Posting (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Quiz: RE(2): Power Plant was declare (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• RE: France to pitch for experimental fus (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• RE: Quiz: RE(2): Power Plant was declare (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: France to pitch for experimental fus (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• HP salary structure (formerly job postin (1) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Re: HP salary structure (formerly job po (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: HP salary structure (formerly job po (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• RE: Article: Lightning emits X-Rays (0) Randall_F_Brich
  
• Re: Re: Job Posting (1) Jane Bragg
  
• Re: Job Posting (1) William V Lipton
  
• Citation missing on Science paper (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Whole-body exposure (1) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Radioiodine Therapy - Identification Car (0) William A. Lorenzen
  
• Intrinsically Safe Radiation Survey Mete (1) John_Wiecjorek
  
• Radioactive statue base in Washington (1) Brian Rees
  
• Re: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan feared (2) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Whole-body exposure (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• AW: Radioactive statue base in Washingto (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Shipyard workers etc (0) Thurman Wenzl
  
• Re: AW: Radioiodine Therapy - Identifica (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Rad Safety Institute
  
• Re: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Radioactive statue base in Washingt (0) Paul_Prichard
  
• Re: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (0) Gary Wilson
  
• Breeder reactors (0) David Whitfill
  
• Nuclear powered rocket (0) David Whitfill
  
• Re: Intrinsically Safe Radiation Survey (0) J. Marshall Reber
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• x-ray diffraction exposures (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Nuclear powered rocket (0) Minnema, Douglas
  
• HP salary info (1) BABusby
  
• Re: HP salary info (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Radon and MS? (0) epirad
  
• RE: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• RE: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• x-ray diffraction exposures - thanks (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• RE: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Breeder reactors (0) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• RE: Radioiodine Therapy - Identification (0) Thompson, Donald L.
  
• Internet study group (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• Meeting Announcement SCCHPS/SCCAAPM Feb. (0) Tosh Ushino, CHP
  
• Alternatives to lead blankets (1) Dave Biela
  
• Radioactivity monitoring at airports (0) John Johnson
  
• AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Call for papers - 22nd Annual Internatio (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• RE: Alternatives to lead blankets (0) Jerald_L_Eby
  
• RE: Nuclear powered rocket (0) David Whitfill
  
• Re: AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Nuclear powered rocket (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Alternatives to lead blankets (0) Darren_Boone
  
• Vulcan 7.5 Mev Flash X-Ray Unit (0) Han, David
  
• AMRSO Listserver (1) Erick Lindstrom
  
• Re: AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (2) John Andrews
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: AMRSO Listserver (0) maury
  
• RE: Radioactive statue base in Washingt (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Breast Feeding Rad Worker (3) Ayers, Rex G
  
• Re: Breast Feeding Rad Worker (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Breast Feeding Rad Worker (other Reg (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Shipyard workers etc[Scanned] (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Re: AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (0) willim01
  
• Job Posting (0) Auroba.L.Al-Samaraee
  
• [Fwd: RE: HP salary info] (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Flood, John
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Kim D. Merritt
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Feedback: European Manual for "Off-site (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Thanks for the Information (0) Dave Biela
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Glow Worm
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Frey, Steven R.
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) BAILHA
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (2) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan (1) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) John Campbell
  
• Landsverk Calibration (0) james.g.barnes
  
• HPS IRC Poster Session Announcement (1) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan (0) Glow Worm
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (2) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• RE: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan (0) Greenbaum, Paul
  
• AW: AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: AW: Alternatives to lead blankets (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Radioactive statue base in Washingt (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: HPS IRC Poster Session Announcement (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Radiation and non cancer outcomes (0) epirad
  
• RE: RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan (0) Langenegger, Armin
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) John Johnson
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Rad Safety Institute
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (1) George J. Vargo
  
• Great Lakes Chapter, Health Physics Soci (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Re: Nuclear-powered spacecraft plan fear (0) John Johnson
  
• Job Opportunity: Mid-Level Health Physic (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Journal of the ICRU Volume 2 No 2 (ICRU (0) E.P. Goldfinch
  
• No radioactive material on Columbia (oth (2) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Nuclear powered rocket (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• RE: No radioactive material on Columbia (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: AW: HPS IRC Poster Session Announcem (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: No radioactive material on Columbia (0) Glow Worm
  
• RE: No radioactive material on Columbia (0) Wright, Will (DHS-PSB)
  
• Re: Breast Feeding Rad Worker (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: No radioactive material on Columbia (1) Frey, Steven R.
  
• Re: No radioactive material on Columbia (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: No radioactive material on Columbia (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• More nuclear propulsion... (0) JPreisig
  
• Space shuttle wreckage and the use of ra (0) David Whitfill
  
• Position Open: Health Physicist Supervi (0) eac8
  
• Position Open: Radiation Laboratory Sup (0) eac8
  
• RE: More nuclear propulsion... (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Radiogardase (0) Harry and Betsy Johns
  
• Radioactive debate heats up (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Shipyard workers etc[Scanned] (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Shipyard workers etc[Scanned] (0) John Jacobus
  
• (Positive) Health Physics Exposure on TV (0) Sharyn Mathews
  
• RE: No radioactive material on Columbia (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Get your CAT Scan here! (0) Miller, Mark L
  
• RE: More nuclear propulsion... (0) Neil, David M
  
• APOLOGIES (0) Sharyn Mathews
  
• RE: Shipyard workers etc[Scanned] (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (4) Susan McElrath
  
• RE: (Positive) Health Physics Exposure o (1) gaxt
  
• AW: Get your CAT Scan here! (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) Tom Hazlett
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (2) Susan McElrath
  
• AW: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Shipyard workers etc[Scanned] (0) John Jacobus
  
• No doubt there were flaws in the nuclea (1) John Cameron
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: (Positive) Health Physics Exposure o (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Get your CAT Scan here! (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: No doubt there were flaws in the nu (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: No doubt there were flaws in the nu (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• CSI Miami FUBAR (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• CSI Miami I-131 Espisode (0) Walter Cofer
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Espisode (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Espisode (0) BLHamrick
  
• CSI Trailer (1) Richard F. Orthen
  
• US-CDC: Second National Report on Human (1) mark.hogue
  
• Miami Herald News on Lawsuit (0) John M Priest
  
• SR RCTs Needed (0) Stephanie Long
  
• PAPERS OF NOBEL LAUREATE, LINUS PAULING, (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Hart, Tim P GS (RASO)
  
• RE: No doubt there were flaws in the nu (0) John Jacobus
  
• Radiochemistry Laboratory Technician (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Re: Get your CAT Scan here! (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Sharyn Mathews
  
• Re: US-CDC: Second National Report on Hu (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Hart, Tim P GS (RASO)
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Sharyn Mathews
  
• Re: Get your CAT Scan here! (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) pbrenberger
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (2) Strickert, Rick
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: RE: CSI Miami I-131 vs. The Simpsons (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Feedback: Detectors being tested to spot (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: Ducks and Radiation (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (2) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Feedback: Detectors being tested to (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Ducks and Radiation (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• CSI Miami I-131 Episode and Schindler's (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Vincent King
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Feedback: Detectors being tested to (1) KVASNICKA Scott
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• CSI Miami: Aiding terrorism (1) John White
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (3) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Espisode (1) Minnema, Douglas
  
• Re: CSI Miami: Aiding terrorism (0) Vincent King
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Feedback: possibly using a "dirty bomb" (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Feedback: Detectors being tested to (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: CSI Miami: Aiding terrorism (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Espisode (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Howard Street Tunnel Fire Simulation (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode (1) Richard F. Orthen
  
• RESRAD Training Course--April 29 (0) Yu, Charley
  
• Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol 103 N (0) E.P. Goldfinch
  
• Decommissioning Training (0) Larry Boing
  
• RE: CSI Miami I-131 Episode rerun (0) M Nivas
  
• Fwd: Radiation Info Sheets (0) John Jacobus
  
• Cs-137 sealed source (0) Gross, Karen M. (Health Phys.)
  
• RE: On the Beach (0) Sonter Mark
  
• Family sues FPL over son's cancer (TFP) (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Japan Nuke operator suspects stress corr (0) Sandy Perle
  
• U.S. Nuclear Power Plants Set Performanc (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Job Opportunity: Two (2) New Jr. Health (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Re: U.S. Nuclear Power Plants Set Perfor (0) J. Marshall Reber
  
• New EHP article on Nuke Regs. (0) Frohmberg, Eric
  
• Historical Site Assessments (0) Rock E. Aker
  
• NSWS etc. (2) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• EPA: Future of Radiation Protection: 202 (0) SKI2NEWENG
  
• Re: NSWS etc. (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: NSWS etc. (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• positive press (1) Zack Clayton
  
• contacts (0) JOHN.RICH
  
• Re: positive press (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Get your CAT Scan here! (0) hflong
  
• Comments on my present view of NSWS & t (0) John Cameron
  
• hp "human capital crisis," continued (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: On the Beach (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• White House on Nuclear and Dirty Bombs (0) Bob
  
• No Subject (0) Larry Boing
  
• Tougher Inspections Urged at Nuke Plants (0) Sandy Perle
  
• ALARA as a detriment (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Study: High-density storage of nuclear w (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: Study: High-density storage of nucle (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: Study: High-density storage of (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Study: High-density storage of nucl (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Update on California Shenanigans (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: [MbrExchange] ALARA as a detriment (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Study: High-density storage of nucle (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Study: High-density storage of nucle (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Study: High-density storage of nucl (1) Steven Dapra
  
• RE: Study: High-density storage of nucle (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Update on California Shenanigans (1) Somerville, Mark
  
• Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the impa (2) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Update on California Shenanigans (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Update on California Shenanigans (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: RE: Update on California Shenanigans (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Manager EH&S Position Available (0) Schuh, James R
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (2) J. J. Rozental
  
• Augusta Chronicle series on Russia's "Nu (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• [Fwd: Re: hp "human capital crisis," con (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (1) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (2) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• ATG bankruptcy waste return (0) NSSIHOU
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• No Subject (0) Larry Boing
  
• Radiation Injury Photos? (1) Tracy Tipping
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Radiation Injury Photos? (1) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Radiation Injury Photos? (0) Tuttle, William K.
  
• Re: Radiation Injury Photos? (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• SR RCTs Needed for Oak Ridge (0) Stephanie Long
  
• SR HPTs Needed Immediately for New York (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Japanese Agency admits fault in past ins (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: "claims" vs failure to act (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• AW: "claims" vs failure to act (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Update on California Shenanigans (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: "claims" vs failure to act (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• New Mexico will take the jobs (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Rad Engineer Needed for Paducah, Kentuck (0) Stephanie Long
  
• parallel to low radiologic dose effect (0) M Nivas
  
• RE: "claims" vs failure to act (0) Neil, David M
  
• Feedback - Q&A: America's new nuclear we (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Nuclear Powered Drone Aircraft (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Contacting the media. (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• RE: [cdn-nucl-l] Nuclear terrorism goes (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (2) Romzo, Cory
  
• Re: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (1) glandry
  
• RE: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) Taylor, Douglas B
  
• Re: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) Tom Hazlett
  
• Retrospective neutron dosimetry (1) epirad
  
• Re: Retrospective neutron dosimetry (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Public Questions regarding uranium proce (0) Joey Michael
  
• RE: Nuclear Powered Drone Aircraft (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: "Healthy Worker Effect?" NSWS (0) hflong
  
• [Fwd: [DBRVH_LTBL] FW: NRC Inspector Gen (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Nuclear Powered Drone Aircraft (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the (0) John Jacobus
  
• Upcoming State Senate Hearing in Los Ang (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Upcoming State Senate Hearing in Los (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• NORM IV Conference (0) Jan Skowronek
  
• Air Sampling for unknowns (1) George Andrews
  
• Application of 40 CFR 190 (1) Claude Laney
  
• RE: Air Sampling for unknowns (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• Re: Retrospective neutron dosimetry (0) James Blute
  
• RE: Application of 40 CFR 190 (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• A new approach to communication on the W (1) John Cameron
  
• Re: Retrospective neutron dosimetry (0) epirad
  
• Re: [cdn-nucl-l] Nuclear terrorism goes (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Double Edged Sword (3) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Contacting the media. (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) Jim Darrough
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (2) Bob Westerdale
  
• NRC Solicits Public Comments on Spent Fu (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Air Sampling for unknowns (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Contacting the media. (0) hubruce
  
• RE: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (1) Dave Derenzo
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (1) Jim Casto
  
• No Subject (0) mejafari
  
• RE: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) Jim Darrough
  
• RE: Contacting the media. (1) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• RE: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) glandry
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Double Edged Sword (1) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Double Edged Sword (1) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Double Edged Sword (0) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: NRC Solicits Public Comments on Spen (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Fwd: [DBRVH_LTBL] FW: NRC Inspector (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Contacting the media. (0) George J. Vargo
  
• lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Upcoming State Senate Hearing in Los (0) BLHamrick
  
• lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Mayak series in the Rocky Mountain News (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Re: A new approach to communication on t (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Jim Hoerner " <jim_hoerner@HOTMAIL.COM>
  
• RE: " Radioactive heat " (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Union of Concerned Scientists (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Steven Dapra
  
• uncertainty principle is untenable (0) bdhill
  
• RE: Air Sampling for unknowns to Use of (1) James Blute
  
• RE: The Gamma Rays of the Radionuclides (0) Todd Brautigam
  
• Re:Air Sampling for unknowns (1) George Andrews
  
• Re: Union of Concerned Scientists (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: NRC Solicits Public Comments on Spen (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Re:Air Sampling for unknowns (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Dirty Bomb - Nova TV show (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Air Sampling for unknowns to Use of (0) John Johnson
  
• RE: Air Sampling for unknowns to Use of (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• re: Air Sampling for Unknowns (0) Michael J Vala
  
• Re: Union of Concerned Scientists (1) garyi
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Norman Cohen
  
• RADSAFE brains turning to mush (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb - Nova TV show (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Union of Concerned Scientists (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Union of Concerned Scientists (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - Nova TV show (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: RADSAFE brains turning to mush (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Number of CHPs (3) BLHamrick
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: A new approach to communication on t (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Number of CHPs (0) mark.hogue
  
• Re: Number of CHPs (0) Dave Brown
  
• Re: Number of CHPs (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Number of CHPs (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (1) Stewart Smith
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) William V Lipton
  
• Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their expert (1) BABusby
  
• Need help finding a source or manufactur (1) Frey, Steven R.
  
• Re: Number of CHPs (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• FW: Terrorism TV Programming and Print A (0) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Need help finding a source or manufa (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• RE: Need help finding a source or manufa (0) Jerald_L_Eby
  
• Re: Number of CHPs (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (2) John Andrews
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (1) Sonter Mark
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) Tsurikov, Nick
  
• Re: lochbaum's bio - yo susan g (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• A reminder of who we are (0) David Whitfill
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (2) John Jacobus
  
• Fwd: FW: Los Alamos 'security' (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Fwd: FW: Los Alamos 'security' (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (2) Chilton, Milton W.
  
• Response to not telling the public about (2) JDNUKE52
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (1) Flood, John
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Fwd: FW: Los Alamos 'security' (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Fwd: FW: Los Alamos 'security' (0) John Jacobus
  
• [Fwd: [Know_Nukes] Davis-Besse lid could (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (6) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Response to not telling the public a (0) Darnell, Peter A.
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) LancerGT
  
• Apology Re: Nova Dirty Bombs (1) JDNUKE52
  
• Check Source Needed (0) Kolb, William (WKOLB)
  
• Commenting on USNRC Environmental Impact (2) mark.hogue
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (2) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Terrorist incap (0) North, David
  
• RE: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (1) Chilton, Milton W.
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) Thompson, Donald L.
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• RE: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Re: Commenting on EPA FRG 13 (was Commen (0) BobCherry
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Apology Re: Nova Dirty Bombs (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: Response to not telling the public a (0) Les Aldrich
  
• Re: Hiding the truth... (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• NOVA show on "Dirty Bomb" to be retelevi (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (3) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - Nova TV show (1) RadSafeInst
  
• RE: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Cancer Factors (1) RadSafeInst
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs (0) George J. Vargo
  
• RE: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Response to not telling the public a (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (2) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Wired: Nuke Lab Can't Keep Snoops Ou (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (1) John Andrews
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) John Andrews
  
• Re: Wired: Nuke Lab Can't Keep Snoops Ou (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Fwd: Response to not telling the public (0) JDNUKE52
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (1) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Response to not telling the public a (0) Tsurikov, Nick
  
• Goiania Summary x Dirty Bomb (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their ex (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Third Epidemiological Study of UK Nuclea (0) modsafety
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - Nova TV show (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) William V Lipton
  
• SUBSCRIBE radsafe marvin.barnett@wxsms.c (0) Majordomo
  
• BOUNCE radsafe@"list.vanderbilt.edu": (0) owner-radsafe
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Dirty bombs (3) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• On credibility (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• BEIR VI on the web? (1) Wesley
  
• Re: Cancer Factors (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Response to not telling the public a (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (1) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) John Jacobus
  
• Excess Inventory - Packard Tri-Carb CA22 (0) Crowley, George M.
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Goiania Summary x Dirty Bomb (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (2) Flood, John
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (2) Flood, John
  
• BetaScout (Triathler) (1) Roy A. Parker
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: BEIR VI on the web? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (1) Tom Hazlett
  
• Re: Response to not telling the public a (0) JDNUKE52
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) Michael Dupray
  
• Homeland Security color change (was RE: (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Indian Point Evacuation Plan Status (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Info on events (3) Brian Rees
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) John Jacobus
  
• Terrorist use of RAM (Was Nova - Dirty B (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• AW: BetaScout (Triathler) (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Response to not telling the public a (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• Re: Info on events (0) Roy A. Parker
  
• Re: Info on events (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Cells lacking MDC1 are sensitive to ioni (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Info on events (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (2) John Andrews
  
• MRI article in Wall St. Journal (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• National Public Radio: Trinity Site, NM (1) Bruce Bugg
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) mark.hogue
  
• Re: Commenting on USNRC Environmental Im (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - London Scenario (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: National Public Radio: Trinity Site, (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• X-ray machines (0) Darnell, Peter A.
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• AW: Dirty bombs (1) Van Dorp Frederik (vdf)
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs (2) Brian Keele
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• International Journal of Radioactive Mat (0) E.P. Goldfinch
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Cleanup standards (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: Nova - Dirty Bombs (0) Cabeza, Luis (MOL)
  
• Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs (0) Tom Hazlett
  
• Re: Cleanup standards (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Dirty bombs (1) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• FEMA seeking comments on Rad Emergency P (0) John Jacobus
  
• Three Mile Island Decades Later:Cancer F (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Dirty bombs- Cs-137 movement into so (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) John Andrews
  
• Re: Cleanup standards (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Dirty bombs (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• EPA Reference Document (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Health Physics Technician Position (0) Michael J Vala
  
• Info on events (0) Arnold Dion
  
• Re: Dirty bombs (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Hanford tanks (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Dirty bombs & dirtier assumptions (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Xenon-133 trap monitor (0) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• EmergencyNet News (1) Susan McElrath
  
• RE: Dirty bombs - radionuclide mobility (0) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: AW: Dirty bombs (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: EmergencyNet News (0) J. J. Rozental