[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the impact of a "dirty bomb"
> The experts know what to be afraid and what is harmless.
Sure, I agree. I am sometimes a bit hesitant when I see the signs outside of
a laboratory warning of biohazards, as I am not familiar with what
appropriate levels of concern are in all situations. I am very respectful of
electrical panels, and permit the experts to tinker around in here. In a
radiation lab I am completely at ease, as I know what is not hazardous, and
what are minor hazards or major hazards, and how to respond to each. Others
sometimes see me carrying around check sources and are not sure whether to
be concerned or not, but they eventually respond to my level of concern when
they are convinced that I understand the situation. When I am with an expert
in any of the situations above, I similarly respond to her expertise and
guage my behavior accordingly. The problem we are struggling with is that
the public is guaging many of its responses from some who have gotten their
attention with false propaganda, and not from valid experts.
> The conclusion is: you cannot expect the man of the street to learn the
> language of the experts, therefore, experts have to learn to express
> themselves in normal, everyday language.
Yes, and this was the focus of those years of articles in the HP newsletter
about effective communication skills, and how different personality types
are better at communicating with the public than others. Most HPs (myself
included) are of the INTJ type, who may quite good in the back room with our
graphs, charts, and computers, but who generally come across as techy and
aloof in public meetings. Choice of the right spokesperson, backed up by
solid technical data, and involvement of the public in the decision-making
process, are all needed to have an effective communication process which can
counter the fearmongering of irresponsible activists.
Mike
Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
Vanderbilt University
1161 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37232-2675
Phone (615) 343-0068
Fax (615) 322-3764
Pager (615) 835-5153
e-mail michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu
internet www.doseinfo-radar.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/