RE: Sec. Ridge accurately addresses the impact of a "dirty bomb"

[BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>]

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Sandy Perle wrote:

>  Take the bomb testing in

> Nevada/Utah where the soldiers were told there would be no effect from the

> radiation,



	--There is still no reason to believe that there were bad effects



 how about Vietnam and agent orange



	--There is still no reason to believe that there were bad effects



, how about the '91 Gulf War and

> chemical exposure



	--There is still no reason to believe that there were bad effects



, take the anthrax deaths in DC and NY, where our scientists

> didn't even know that anthrax would simply move through the molecular gaps in the

> paper envelopes



	--Not having known something is very different from deception.

Were there claims that anthrax could not get through the envelopes?



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/