[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their expert - FYI



When  technical people  compare the Goiania Accident and Dirty Bomb, no

doubt Goiania is the best scenario, and I do believe the response in case of

a Dirty Bomb wouldn't  be worst than the Goiania accident.



If you consider response  for developed countries like USA, that have enough

equipment and personal, material resources, economic resources, medical

support and Waste Repository to transfer the waste generated, the technical

response is not the more complex problem. If you consider developing

countries or even those  with good level for technical response, the

situation is completely different, taking into account the capacity of each.

Not only technical response was the main aspect of Goiania's radiological

accident, but also the management of conflicts - social, psychological,

political, economic, and misunderstanding problems had to be faced in

Goiania. Of these, stigmatization and discrimination against the victims and

against the main products of the city (state).  -  No dear colleagues, it is

not only the technical response to deal with during an accident, but rather

all the above mentioned conflicts present lessons that must be analyzed   to

improve  safety culture and experience to be shared.

There is still much to be learned from the Radiological Accident in Goiania,

even 15 years were lapsed.

I agree with  Lexi Krock and Rebecca Deusser describing the Chronology of

Events (in the site provided by Busby)

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/dirtybomb/

have mentioned about Goiania: The incident -- a radiation disaster second

only to Chernobyl in size and scope. I would like to discuss with



Jose de Julio Rozental













----- Original Message -----

From: <BABusby@AOL.COM>

To: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:33 PM

Subject: Nova - Dirty Bombs - Who is their expert - FYI





http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/dirtybomb/





Dr. Charles Ferguson is Scientist-in-Residence based in the Washington D.C.

Office of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies. He joined CNS from the

U.S. Department of State, where he was a Foreign Affairs Officer in the

Office of the Senior Coordinator for Nuclear Safety in the Bureau of

Nonproliferation. At the State Department, he helped coordinate U.S.

government interagency nuclear safety policy on decommissioned Russian

marine nuclear reactors, the Korean Peninsula Energy Development

Organization (KEDO) light water reactor project in the DPRK, Indian and

Pakistani commercial nuclear power plants, and Russian plutonium production

reactors. He has also served as a nuclear arms control and non-proliferation

analyst at the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), where he directed

the Nuclear Policy Project. At FAS, he analyzed many arms control and

nonproliferation issues, including missile defense, the Comprehensive Test

Ban Treaty, and deep cuts in nuclear arsenals. His !

public policy articles, commentaries, and letters have appeared in Arms

Control Today, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Defense News,

Disarmament Diplomacy, The Naval War College Review, Physics Today, The FAS

Public Interest Report, The Los Angeles Times, and The Washington Post.



A United States Naval Academy alumnus, achieving a B.S. degree with

distinction in physics and a commission as an officer in the U.S. Navy, he

graduated from the Naval Nuclear Power School and the Submarine Officers

School. While supervising an engineering crew of a nuclear power and

propulsion plant on a fleet ballistic missile submarine, he also served as

that ship's sonar and reactor controls officer. Upon leaving the Navy, he

earned an M.A. and a Ph.D. in physics from Boston University. Dr. Ferguson

has also worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Space Telescope

Science Institute, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the

Institute for Physical Science and Technology at the University of Maryland.

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/







************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/