[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: skyshine from radiography sources, Tokaimura criticality acci dent
Title: Re: skyshine from radiography sources, Tokaimura criticality accident
The Tokaimura criticality accident
was very unique in that the criticality continued for approximately 20 hours
before the water blanket around the tank could be drained and the system allowed
to reach a subcritical state. Usually a criticality accident is a pulse or
burst type prompt criticality event. The energy released during the pulse
is usually sufficient to change the geometry (through container
deformation) or moderation (through boiling off of the water moderator) of the
system sufficient to make further criticality pulses impossible or at least
less powerful. Of all known criticality accidents world wide (Ref.
LA-13638), this accident's duration far exceeded previous accidents.
Because some residents were not evacuated until 3.5 to 4 hours after the
reaction started and were within a few hundred meters of the source, the doses
received by a handful of the nearest members of the public were due primarily to
the direct radiation and not sky shine.
The Criticality Slide Rule (Ref. NUREG/CR-6504, Vol. 2 or
ORNL/TM-13322/V2) indicates that for the type of accident at Tokaimura, at 30
meters, the skyshine dose is approximately 1/10 the total dose and at 300
meters the skyshine dose is 1/2 the total
dose.
I have
two separate reports generated soon after the accident that discuss radiological
exposures, measurements taken, emergency response, and the steps taken to halt
the ongoing criticality. One report was prepared by Valerie Putnam on
behalf of the American Nuclear Society and one prepared by the IAEA. Both
reports are in PDF format and easily transmitted. I am not aware if they
are available on the internet or not.
I'm not sure if this answers Mr. Franta's question, but I hope it
helps.
Jason Bolling
Nuclear Criticality Safety Manager
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Stewart & Radsafers,
I'm curious about this skyshine from
industrial radiography sources, which you mentioned in the anecdote
below.
How would such common occurrences compare
- dose-wise - to the dose received by people in the vicinity of the 1999
criticality accident in Tokaimura - "Japan's worst nuclear accident ", "the worst nuclear
accident since Chernobyl, angering radiation victims", which "exposed more
than 600 people to radiation."
Would these be roughly the same order of
magnitude ?
Thanks.
Jaro