Re: [Fwd: Re: You can't have too much NVLAP.]

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>]

On 5 May 2003 at 15:16, William V Lipton wrote:



> "Secondary" dosimetry is usually not required to be in compliance but

> is often placed on workers to back up primary dosimetry and get more

> info.  If NVLAP is required, then secondary dosimetry will be used less

> often and more sparingly due to the increased cost and availability of

> NVLAP dosimetry and the decreased usability of non-NVLAP dose info.  The

> end result - in my opinion - will be workers with less dosimetry - and

> thus - less information for dose reconstruction about an event if

> something goes wrong.  



I agree completely with the above, as stated previously.



I support a comment to my proposals stating the above. The above is 

my intent, and, I don't want that to be misinterpreted by anyone, 

including the NRC in their review of the proposal.



-------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Director, Technical

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/