I'm missing something, here. Are you agreeing with me?
Bill
John Jacobus wrote:
Bill,The licensee is being fined, not the RSO. It is the RSO's responsibility to implement the conditions of the license, but the licensee, the hospital, is ultimately responsible for non-compliance.William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM> wrote:
I don't know. The RSO should make sure it's someone else's decision. The
policy should limit the RSO's responsibility to reporting the violation to
management and requesting their actions to regain compliance.The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com"Flood, John" wrote:
> > 1. If not already in place, develop a written policy statement regarding
> > nuclear medicine patients who cannot be released under 10 CFR 35.75.
>
> Perhaps I'm being a bit naïve here, but does the hospital have the legal
> authority to compel a patient to stay? If the patient chooses to go home or
> to hospice care, can the hospital prevent this? Would this be imprisoning a
> person for medical reasons?
>-- JohnJohn Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.