[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE AGAINST ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL INMICHIGANFOR OVEREXPOSURE TO A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
I assume that you find the assumptions of the NRC comical. I
certianly find your comments comic relief.
John
/Just because your paranoid doesn't mean no one is after you./
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM
>To: sjd@swcp.com
>Subject: Re: NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE AGAINST ST. JOSEPH MERCY
>HOSPITAL INMICHIGANFOR OVEREXPOSURE TO A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
>Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 15:05:25 -0400
>
>>Even though I do not agree with every regulation I have to follow, I
>always approach
>>regulatory compliance with the attitude that the regulators are
>making their best,
>>good faith efforts to protect the public, and that I have a legal
>and moral obligation
>>to obey the regulatory letter and spirit. I consider anything else
>to be
>>unprofessional and, in most cases, counterproductive.
>>
>>As much as I am concerned, I have to admit, however, that some of
>these rants offer a
>>measure of comic relief. I am especially amused when someone can
>claim to perform a
>>better dose estimate than what's reported, without having taken any
>measurements or
>>seen any of the underlying data. I'll be the first to admit that I
>do not have such
>>abilities.
>>
>>The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
>>It's not about dose, it's about trust.
>>Curies forever.
>>
>>Bill Lipton
>>liptonw@dteenergy.com
>>
>>
>>Steven Dapra wrote:
>>
>>> May 15
>>>
>>> EXCELLENT POST, CAROL.
>>>
>>> Up to this point, you have made the only truly useful
>contribution to this
>>> long drawn out dispute.
>>>
>>> To answer the question at the end of your post, the reason
>the NRC is
>>> making so much racket is that it is IN CHARGE, and it HAS THE
>POWER to do
>>> whatever it wants to, and it is going to exercise its power come
>H___ or
>>> high water or anything else. This is not about safety, or dose,
>or even
>>> regulations. It is about power and the exercise of power come
>what may.
>>>
>>> Excellent post, Carol . . . . . .
>>>
>>> Steven Dapra
>>> sjd@swcp.com
>>>
>>>
>*********************************************************************
>***
>>> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
>unsubscribe,
>>> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text
>"unsubscribe
>>> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no
>subject line.
>>> You can view the Radsafe archives at
>http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>>
>>
>>********************************************************************
>****
>>You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
>unsubscribe,
>>send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text
>"unsubscribe
>>radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject
>line.
>>You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsa
>fe/
>>
>>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/