[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: Uranium in GW correlations w/ Radon, etc.



 
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu [mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]Im Auftrag von Frohmberg, Eric
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2003 22:11
An: Radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Betreff: Uranium in GW correlations w/ Radon, etc.

Hey all,
 
I'm a toxicologist with the Env. Tox. Program in the Maine Bur. of Health.  In Maine we have a problem with U in well water - not a horrible problem overall - maybe a few percent of wells above 20-30 ug/l, but what makes my palms sweat is the occasional wells in the 2,000+ ppb range.  We know that kidney tox is the issue (altho you do get some cancer risk at these high concentrations - especially when you take into account disequilibrium).  (Obviously, we tell them to take corrective actions).
 
But what I want to look into is correlations between U and radon or radium in well water (I should say this is a little bit academic - we have a radon issue in Maine as well - our recommendation is that everyone do a radon test, there doesn't seem to be a lot of radium in wellwater in Maine).  While I'm waiting for our in house data to appear, I thought I'd ask the collective wisdom in radsafe land.  I haven't found a lot in the literature that suggests decent correlations (it really seems to depend a lot on local geology, etc.). Do any of you have any direct experience or opinions?  In particular, I'm more interested in correlations between U and radium in GW at these higher levels.  Thoughts?
 
---------------------------------
 
Eric,
 
From all I know - and I have followed these questions since a long time - there cannot be established correlations between Ra-226 and Uranium, between Ra-226 and Ra-228, between Ra-226 and Rn-222 and between any radionuclide of the decay chains to another one. Geological factors determine the abundance of radionuclides as well as non-radioactive heavy metals. Some disequilibria are even used to study geological phenomena.
Sorry to disappoint you, but I recommend the one and only reasonable approach to the question of radionuclide distribution: measurements.
 
Best regards,
 
Franz