[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Geiger counter in every human revealed
New Scientist reports:-
Geiger counter in every human revealed
19:00 28 May 03
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993768
How much damage does cosmic radiation do to frequent flyers? Is depleted
uranium from shells causing cancers in former war zones such as Kosovo and
Iraq? The discovery that certain kinds of radiation leave a distinctive
pattern of damage in our cells could help answer these questions.
"If this works, we'll be able to take a measurement and see the lifetime
exposure in that person," says David Brenner of Columbia University in New
York. "Often there is no other reliable record of individual exposure." It
is this uncertainty about radiation exposure that makes it hard to pin down
the health risks.
"That they found this effect was there at all is significant," says Michael
Cornforth, a radiation biologist at the University of Texas Medical Branch
in Galveston. "But I was flabbergasted by how clear-cut it was."
Radiation is harmful because of its ionising effect, which can break DNA
chains. If the broken pieces are rejoined incorrectly, the resulting genetic
scrambling can harm cells or, far worse, set them on the road to cancer.
Some genetic damage is easy to spot, such as when parts of different
chromosomes are exchanged - known as interchromosomal changes. But because
mutagenic chemicals can also cause such exchanges, this is not a reliable
indicator of exposure to radiation.
Heavy particles
Researchers have long suspected that slow-moving, heavy particles such as
alpha particles and neutrons should leave a characteristic pattern of
damage. These kinds of radiation are known as "densely ionising" because
they wreak havoc within a short tunnel; "sparsely ionising" X-rays or gamma
rays spread their damage along a much longer path. Because the damage from
densely ionising radiation is so concentrated, it is far more likely to hit
one chromosome several times, triggering deletions or reordering of its DNA.
Detecting intrachromosomal changes like these has been extremely difficult
till now. But Brenner's team, together with a Russian group, took advantage
of new dyes to "paint" bands on chromosomes. Image analysis software
translates this into false-colour pictures (see graphic), making it easy to
spot any rearrangements.
The team used the technique to analyse chromosome 5 in thousands of blood
cells from 31 people who had worked at a secret nuclear weapons facility
near Ozyorsk in Russia. Though most of the workers were last exposed to
densely ionising radiation from plutonium over 10 years ago, the team found
a surprising amount of damage.
Nearly four per cent of blood cells in highly exposed workers had
rearrangements within chromosome 5. Extrapolating from this, Brenner thinks
that 62 per cent of these workers' blood cells have damage within at least
one chromosome.
Workers with moderate levels of exposure had a lower level of damage, while
those with no radiation exposure had none. Even workers at a nuclear reactor
exposed to high levels of sparsely ionising gamma rays and mutating
chemicals had very few intrachromosomal changes, though they had significant
interchromosomal damage.
There is still a lot of work to do before the technique can be widely
adopted. "We need to automate the technique," Brenner says. "Even in this
small study, it took us two years to look at all the cells."
Journal reference: The American Journal of Human Genetics (vol 72, p 1162)
Philip Cohen
Mr FWP Dawson Head Health Physics
Directorate of Defence Safety Environment and Fire Policy (D SEF Pol)
Ministry of Defence
Room 213 St Giles Court
1-13 St Giles High Street
London. WC2H 8LD
Dsef pol web site: http://www.mod.uk/dsef
Phone +44(0)20 780 70215
Fax +44(0)20 721 83943
Email GTNET: fred.dawson.modsafety@gtnet.gov.uk
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/